The Republican budget resolution is a clear contrast in values. They’re charging forward on $1.1 trillion in tax cuts for the top 1% and threatening the exact same in potential cuts to Medicaid and programs that feed our kids.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Nevada District 2
Mark E. Amodei
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 553
Yes75%
No22%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align98%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 2
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mark E. Amodei
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNevada District 2
SoupScore
Mark E.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 9 sponsored · 42 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
🧵 BREAKING NEWS: the world’s richest man learns that actions have consequences…
It’s a big problem that President Trump can’t remember one of our most important security partnerships with Australia and the UK as
*checks notes*
the UK Prime Minister sits right next to him.
Mass layoffs and Social Security office closures at won’t improve efficiency — they’ll hurt beneficiaries, full stop.
Donald Trump said he wouldn’t touch Social Security — he lied.
🚨Attention federal science employees in #RI01:
Given the Trump administration’s attacks on federal workers and science agencies, the Science, Space, and Technology Committee wants to hear from you!
Share your story through the survey link below ⬇️
democrats-science.house.gov/sciencefirings
Great to meet with NASN! In schools across RI, nurses like Amy are essential in supporting mental health, offering care, compassion, and early intervention.
I'm proud to support efforts that would recognize their work & grow the pipeline of nursing students to schools in our community.
I joined @reed.senate.gov, @whitehouse.senate.gov, and @magaziner.house.gov demanding answers about these drastic cuts.
Trump’s illegal decision to reduce the reimbursement rate for indirect research costs would have a devastating effect on RI research institutions that rely on NIH funding to carry out their life saving work.
$230 billion in potential cuts to SNAP
+ $880 billion in potential cuts to Medicaid
= $1.1 trillion in tax giveaways to the top 1%
We can't — and won't — stay silent while they hurt ordinary Americans to give to the rich.
Because it's the clearest example of how Republicans are looking to gut programs that feed and care for everyday Americans in order to cut taxes for the richest few.
🧵 In the @housebudgetdems.bsky.social committee and on the House floor, my colleagues and I have been using this simple graphic.
Why?
Reposted byCongressman Gabe Amo
After 3 surgeries, a blood clot, infection & being hospitalized for over a week, the moment I was discharged I rushed to the airport so I could get on a plane to DC & vote NO on Republicans’ disastrous budget plan.
Rep. Pettersen traveled from Colorado with her newborn son so she could vote NO. 🧵
Tonight, 217 Republicans voted to betray the needs of ordinary Americans by shoveling over $1 trillion in tax giveaways to the richest 1%.
Instead of working to lower costs, Republicans are charging full steam ahead to abandon their constituents and cut health care and nutrition programs.
Before every vote, I ask myself two questions: who does this benefit? Who does this hurt?
Today, the answers are clear. This Republican plan would benefit the richest 1% and hurt families struggling to make ends meet by taking away Medicaid & nutritional assistance.
I joined @alivitali.bsky.social to discuss how listening to the people we serve is central to preventing Republicans from cutting programs & making Americans poorer and sicker.
After hearing the impact on community health centers & seniors last week, I’m even more clear about how the GOP budget resolution would hurt Rhode Islanders.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History553 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
553 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.