Warren Davidson headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Ohio District 8
Born
March 1, 1970
Age 56
Phone
(202) 225-6205
Office
2113 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Ohio District 8

Warren Davidson

Warren Earl Davidson is an American politician and former military officer serving as the U.S. representative for Ohio's 8th congressional district since 2016. The district includes a swath of suburban and exurban territory between Cincinnati and Dayton. Davidson is a member of the Republican Party.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 552
Yes75%
No22%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align90%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Warren Davidson headshot
Warren Davidson
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanOhio District 8
SoupScore
Warren's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 40 sponsored · 57 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Here's the proof: Republicans are only looking out for their millionaire and billionaire friends – and they're willing to gamble with your lives to pay them off.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
If a bill is so bad that you have to exempt entire states from its consequences to win the votes you need—just don't pass the bill! Why do people in Washington state deserve Medicaid & SNAP cuts, but others don't? This is plain wrong, and it's just no way to legislate.
Get this: Republicans voted NO to protect Medicaid funding for addiction treatment. If you’re battling addiction, Republicans are happy to throw you under the bus in order to give a billionaire another tax break. It’s shameful.
Hard to believe I'm siding with the guy who spent $300 million to get Trump elected, but he's not wrong: Republicans’ plan to run up the national debt to hand out giant tax breaks to billionaires will be an economic disaster.
Republicans just voted to DEFUND health clinics and deny women basic health care. @murray.senate.gov forced a vote to try and protect that critical funding. Republicans voted NO.
In classic Republican fashion—they've found a way to make their "Big Beautiful Bill" even worse. More cuts to health care. More money added to the debt. More Americans suffer.
Senate Republicans have lost their spines—all they do is bow down to Donald Trump and his billionaire donors. They know this bill will kill people. And they just look the other way.
Republicans just voted NO to save funding for labor and delivery rooms for mommas and babies. @bluntrochester.senate.gov asked a simple question: do we stand for billionaires or moms and babies? Republicans voted with the billionaires and threw mommas and babies under the bus. It’s cruel.
Republicans are putting 17 million lives at risk in their “Big Beautiful Bill.” These are more than just numbers. These are real people who deserve to live a life without worrying they will go broke if they need health care.
USD1—a stablecoin linked to President Trump and his family—is now the second most traded in the world. Next week, the House is voting on a bill that would let Trump’s crypto cash machine keep growing with no guardrails. Congress can rein in this corruption—or greenlight it.
Republicans are trying to slash funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in their Big, Ugly Bill. The CFPB has returned $21 billion directly to 205 million Americans scammed by giant banks and corporations. Democrats are introducing an amendment to stop these cuts.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
Growing up, my dad lost his job after getting MS. Mom was raising 7 kids & needed skills training before she could find work—both unemployed for months. Food stamps kept us fed, but my family wouldn't even qualify today under the Big Ugly bill. It's just wrong. Senators must vote NO.
Republicans just voted to RAISE Americans’ health care costs. @ossoff.senate.gov led Democrats in fighting to stop premiums from spiking and bring down costs for working families. But Republicans said NO — they just want to give tax breaks to billionaires.
Under Trump and Republicans’ “Big Beautiful Bill,” 17 MILLION people will lose their health care. That’s your grandma with a walker, your niece who was born with a life-threatening condition, and your neighbor whose kid just broke his arm.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
This isn’t over yet. Spread the word. Republicans' Big, Beautiful Bill would: — Kick 16 million off their health care — Close 1 out of 4 nursing homes — Hike your energy bills — Add at least $4 trillion to the national debt It’s a gift to the rich and a disaster for families.
Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress are planning to write a $15 BILLION check to Meta simply for existing — paid for by cutting health care for millions of Americans. They care more about helping billionaire corporations than helping you.
Republicans just voted NO to saving health care for MILLIONS of people. @wyden.senate.gov demanded that the Senate remove every single Medicaid cut from this bill because we believe no baby should go hungry so Jeff Bezos can buy another yacht. Hear that again: Republicans voted NO.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
552 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-26H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 695 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 788 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H.R. 818 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H.R. 832 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-02-24H.R. 825 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-13H.R. 35 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-12H.R. 77 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-12H.R. 77 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-02-11H. Res. 122 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-02-11H. Res. 122 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-02-10H.R. 736 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-10H.R. 692 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-02-05H.R. 776 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-02-04H.R. 43 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-01-23H.R. 471 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 375 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-01-22S. 5 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 165 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-21H.R. 186 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGNOFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsNONOFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 12Next →