Dwight Evans headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Pennsylvania District 3
Born
May 16, 1954
Age 72
Phone
(202) 225-4001
Office
1105 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Pennsylvania District 3

Dwight Evans

Dwight E. Evans is an American politician and former educator serving as the U.S. representative for Pennsylvania's 3rd congressional district since 2016. A member of the Democratic Party, he previously served in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, representing the 203rd district from 1981 to 2016.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 552
Yes38%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting8%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 3

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Dwight Evans headshot
Dwight Evans
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratPennsylvania District 3
SoupScore
Dwight's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 13 sponsored · 196 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Congressional Black Caucus calls on Lutnick to protect Minority Business Development Agency
Congressional Black Caucus calls on Lutnick to protect Minority Business Development Agency
The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) has sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Commerce demanding Secretary Howard Lutnick protect the Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA) from President Trump’s latest executive order.  “For years, the MBDA has provided critical resources for Black-owned businesses across the nation,”  the CBC’s letter reads.  “As a result of recent actions taken by this administration, minority-owned businesses are set to face a number of hurdles imposed by President Trump that will further cripple our already buckling economy. It is imperative that we protect hard-working Americans by investing in opportunities that an agency like the MBDA provides.” The MBDA, created under former President Nixon’s administration, aims “to promote the growth and global competitiveness of Minority Business Enterprises in order to unlock the country’s full economic potential.”  In 2021, when Congress passed the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, it made the MBDA a permanent agency. Trump’s March 17 executive order,  Continuing the Reduction of The Federal Bureaucracy,  seeks to dismantle the agency. Some conservatives have argued the agency is discriminatory toward white people. But the CBC emphasized that Black Americans own 3.5 million businesses and employ more than 1.2 million people. The caucus also highlighted that the MBDA plays a vital role in generating capital and jobs. In 2023, the agency facilitated $1.2 billion in capital, secured $1.6 billion in contracts, and generated or saved more than 14,000 jobs. “This administration’s efforts to take our country back in time and remove critical tools of economic success for minority populations will hinder the potential economic growth of every community in this nation,” the CBC wrote. “We ask that you protect and promote this economic driver and ensure that this agency, which has significantly contributed to our nation’s success, continues to thrive.” The CBC said dismantling the agency would not only undermine the economy, but is also unconstitutional. Halting services provided by the MBDA would also violate the Anti-Deficiency Act and appropriations laws, the caucus said. The CBC is calling for Lutnick to explain how the Department of Commerce plans to continue the operations of the MBDA to avoid violating the Anti-Deficiency Act, as well as to defend the proposed closure of the Agency under the executive order.  The caucus is also seeking answers to whether the department will reinstate staff that have been placed on administrative leave. The CBC gave Lutnick until April 18 to respond to the letter.  “We urge you not to be complicit in this administration’s complete disregard for the letter of the law,” the CBC wrote. “Unlawfully dissolving federal agencies like MBDA by executive action is a threat to our democracy.”
On today’s Democratic Daily Download, @meeks.house.gov explains why the Signal chat was a threat to our national security, why Hegseth must resign and how Dems are forcing a vote to compel the Trump Administration into releasing all details surrounding the disclosure of classified info.
This new report shows why Trump should fire the defense secretary & national security adviser. Unlike the DHS staffer, Hegseth & Waltz have faced ZERO consequences for their actions. I repeat my call for an independent investigation of #Signalgate!
A longtime DHS employee inadvertently sent unclassified details of an upcoming ICE operation to a journalist in late January, officials say. But unlike the case of Trump officials discussing military plans in a Signal chat, the employee was put on leave.
As I said to @cbsphiladelphia.bsky.social: The secretary of defense and national security adviser must resign NOW. If they won't, President Trump should fire them. There MUST be a full independent investigation into this gross, irresponsible mishandling of sensitive military information.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
552 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderNONOPassed
2025-07-15H.R. 1717 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-14S. 1596 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1770 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1709 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H.R. 1 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 275 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 875 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-06-25H. Res. 519 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as AmendedYESYESPassed
2025-06-24Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 537 (119th)Kill the motionNOYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3422 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3394 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 1998 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-12Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-12S. 331 (119th)Final passageNOYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 884 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 2096 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 481 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 488 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeNONOPassed
2025-06-09H.R. 2035 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-06H.R. 2966 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 12Next →