Maggie Goodlander headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for New Hampshire District 2
Born
November 4, 1986
Age 39
Phone
(202) 225-5206
Office
223 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Hampshire District 2

Maggie Goodlander

Margaret Vivian Goodlander is an American politician, lawyer, and former naval officer who has served as the U.S. representative from New Hampshire's 2nd congressional district since 2025. A member of the Democratic Party, she is the wife of former U.S. national security advisor Jake Sullivan.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 551
Yes49%
No50%
Present1%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party7%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 2

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Maggie Goodlander headshot
Maggie Goodlander
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Hampshire District 2
SoupScore
Maggie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 10 sponsored · 82 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

These payment systems ensure that people across New Hampshire receive their Social Security checks, Medicare payments, and much more. Any effort to interfere with these critical processes is extremely dangerous and I oppose it in the strongest possible terms. (2/3)
In the cover of night, the Trump Admin gave Elon Musk – someone who the American people did not elect into any position of power – unprecedented access to the Treasury Department and the confidential personal information of millions of Americans. (1/3)
I’ve heard directly from Granite State communities & small businesses about how President Trump’s sweeping tariffs will raise prices & threaten their ability to operate. These tariffs will increase costs at the grocery store & the gas station & hardworking families across NH will pay the price.
President Trump's sweeping tariffs would raise the cost of everything from cars and gas to housing, heat, and groceries for hardworking Granite Staters. That is unacceptable. I am working with anyone who will work with me to bring down prices for New Hampshire.
Supporting the health of our service members isn’t just a moral responsibility—it’s critical to our readiness & national security. Proud to join Reps Chrissy Houlahan & Mikie Sherrill in calling on Secretary Hegseth to continue to reimburse travel costs for service women seeking reproductive care.
Today, I sat down with Maj. Gen. David J. Mikolaities to discuss how we can deliver for the brave men and women who serve in our New Hampshire National Guard. I will always fight for our servicemembers on the Armed Services Committee.
This morning, I visited Pacific Defense and saw firsthand the amazing work happening here in Nashua to contribute to our national defense. As a Member of the Armed Services Committee, I'm working to deliver for our servicemembers & ensure our defense industry is the most innovative in the world.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
551 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3616 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 64 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 61 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-15S. 284 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 2550 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 432 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3638 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3628 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 939 (119th)Kill the motionYESNOPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 432 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Motion to CommitYESYESFailed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-10H.R. 1676 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-09S. 356 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1049 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1069 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 1005 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 4305 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 2965 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-02H.R. 4423 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-01H.R. 5348 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 1949 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 3109 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 12Next →