Kevin Hern headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Oklahoma District 1
Born
December 4, 1961
Age 64
Phone
(202) 225-2211
Office
171 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Oklahoma District 1

Kevin Hern

Kevin Ray Hern is an American politician and businessman from Oklahoma. A Republican, he is serving as a member of the United States House of Representatives for Oklahoma's 1st congressional district since 2018.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 551
Yes77%
No20%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Kevin Hern headshot
Kevin Hern
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanOklahoma District 1
SoupScore
Kevin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 16 sponsored · 30 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I am annoyed by how much of this episode involved me wishcasting for how Digital ID could work if the government were competent, strategic, thoughtful or politically savvy. It shouldn't be my job to go "here is the left-wing case for digital ID", it should be Keir Starmer's!
Labour want to bring in digital I.D. and many people do NOT like it. Are they right? Are they wrong? And what is the “Lethal Trifecta” that makes the plan so risky? @hannahfearn.bsky.social, @jonnelledge.bsky.social, @hern.bsky.social and @mattgreencomedy.com discuss 👉 linktr.ee/ohgodwhatnow...
I guess maybe standards fell rapidly but I’d be more inclined to think OP is lying, or OP’s date was lying. When I was there there were certainly the occasional email going “you get a free dinner please we need volunteers” but never that
The reason they had to “work alongside the Motor Insurer’s Bureau” and so why this is a news story about a crackdown rather than the status quo is that they’re gonna run aren’t allowed to access the DVLA database automatically
Yeah it’s why it’s one of the ones I closely track. They’re an independent outfit, running a battery of tests, that have an easy to grasp implication, and which is updated in real time. Main issue is that they’re gonna run out of test suite eventually which will break the time series
A fun thing about uninsured cars: I can, at any moment, type a number plate into my phone and find out if a car is uninsured. police cars can, at any moment, automatically use ANPR to check the number plate of the car in front of them. It is illegal to combine these two capabilities
much more aggressive use of ANPR is a big one. We have a database of uninsured number plates and it is illegal to hook it up to the cameras on police cars.
Friends car was just totalled by an uninsured banned driver _with a court date for driving offences tomorrow_. Three kids in her car when it happened, thankfully only one broken collarbone between them.
A couple of times I’ve had the pleasure of asking “are you saying the school week should be longer or that there are things that should be cut from the curriculum” and strangely no-one wants their name attached to either of THOSE proposals
Thing that's good about it is it's the same battery of tasks that they've been testing since Feb 2025. Agree that it's focused on SWE stuff
Although it doesn't exist as such in law, in practice a London council tenancy is an asset worth hundreds of thousands of pounds. Right to Buy is a process where you pay to swap that asset for the property itself.
If your social rent is £2,000 less than the house would rent for on the open market, then it's basically worth it _for the council_ if you exercise RtB and then sell it back to them for £270k, provided you then live for a little over a decade longer in a different house you own
The thing that always gets missed in RtB conversations though is that the person exercising RtB is also giving up a lifetime tenancy at vastly below-market-rate rent. Every chance that, for a house in central hackney, that asset is worth £270k!
Well that's where I wonder. What's the lifetime cost of a council tenant to the council? Presumably somewhere like hackney it could be approaching that level anyway
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
551 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-04-29H. Res. 1224 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-29H. Res. 1224 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-04-27H.R. 227 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-04-27H.R. 7959 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-04-23H.R. 5587 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 6387 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 6387 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-04-22H.R. 4690 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 4690 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1182 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1189 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1189 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-04-21S. 1020 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-21H.R. 2493 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-21H.R. 5201 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-20H.R. 5200 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-04-20H.R. 1681 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H. Res. 1156 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 1689 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-16H. Res. 965 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6398 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6398 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-04-16H.R. 6409 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6409 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-04-16H. Con. Res. 40 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-04-15H. Res. 965 (119th)Motion to DischargeNONOPassed
2026-04-15H. Res. 1174 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-15H. Res. 1174 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-04-14H.R. 7613 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-14H.R. 1011 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-28H. Res. 1142 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-03-28H. Res. 1142 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-03-28Motion to AdjournYESYESPassed
2026-03-27H.R. 7084 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-03-26H.R. 8029 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-26H.R. 8029 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-03-26H. Res. 1128 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-03-25H.R. 5103 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-25H.R. 5103 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-03-25H. Res. 1131 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-03-25H. Res. 1131 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-03-24H.R. 6422 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2026-03-19H.R. 4638 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-18H.J. Res. 139 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESFailed
2026-03-18H.R. 1958 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-18H.R. 556 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-18H.R. 556 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 12Next →