Mike Levin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 49
Born
October 28, 1978
Age 47
Phone
(202) 225-3906
Office
2352 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49

Mike Levin

Michael Ted Levin is an American politician and attorney who serves as the U.S. representative for California's 49th congressional district since 2019. He is a member of the Democratic Party and represents most of San Diego's North County, as well as part of southern Orange County.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 550
Yes45%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 49

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mike Levin headshot
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 93 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Senate investigators interviewed people who were dragged from cars, threatened with guns, denied medical care, and held for days without access to a lawyer. Some of the victims were children. All were Americans. And the administration still claims it never occurs.
ProPublica has uncovered something the Trump administration keeps insisting never happens. Immigration agents have detained and mistreated American citizens. Not one or two isolated mistakes. More than 170 citizens this year.
My grandfather’s generation understood service as a lifelong commitment. I carry that every day in this job. Our Marines and their families deserve leaders who fight for them with the same dedication they show for our country. This year’s defense bill is another step in keeping that promise.
This is what it means to honor the people who serve. Not just with words, but with tangible improvements to their daily lives, their safety, and their ability to train and operate at the highest level.
The bill includes a 3.8% pay raise, major new investments in barracks and family housing, expanded child care assistance in high-cost regions like ours, and a required review of how the basic housing allowance is calculated so housing support reflects real market costs.
This includes $23.5M for a hub that keeps units connected, protected, and mission ready, $43.8M for a new Fire Emergency Response Station, so first responders on base have the tools they need, and $22.7M dollars for a modern mess hall and armory to support training and day-to-day operations.
I’m proud that this year’s defense bill delivers more than $90 million in new investments for Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. These projects strengthen readiness, modernize daily operations, and improve the quality of life for Marines and their families.
Reposted byMike Levin
We’ve got real momentum now to finally BAN stock trading by members of Congress. Let's put a stop to what’s happening on both sides of the aisle and begin to restore America's trust.
We’ve got real momentum now to finally BAN stock trading by members of Congress. Let's put a stop to what’s happening on both sides of the aisle and begin to restore America's trust.
This is a practical, common-sense step to strengthen our democracy for the long run. Let’s build momentum and get it done.
Nearly every state uses some form of term limits or reappointment for their highest courts. It strengthens the system without politicizing it. Lifetime appointments give individuals extraordinary power for far too long. Term limits don’t weaken the Court. They modernize it and make it accountable.
This reform keeps the Court independent. Justices would still serve with distinction, then continue contributing as senior judges, the same way it already works across much of the federal judiciary.
I’m proud to cosponsor a bill to set 18-year term limits for Supreme Court justices. An 18-year term, with one new Justice appointed every two years, will bring balance and predictability. No more strategic retirements. Just a steady, fair process that restores trust.
Families are getting squeezed while the president insists we’re living in a golden age. He’s grading a fantasy he makes up as he goes.
Trump says the economy gets an A+++++ because prices are “falling everywhere.” I don’t know what country he’s living in, but it’s not the one the rest of us buy groceries in. Even Fox News spent the week reporting rising prices.
I think about my grandfather, Rosendo Bringas, who came here from Mexico as a boy and became a citizen at age 50. He worked his whole life for the protection and stability that citizenship promised.
Anyone who cares about public safety should be alarmed. Wrongly detaining citizens is reckless government overreach. It wastes resources on people who pose no threat and erodes trust in the agencies that actually keep us safe.
Senate investigators interviewed people who were dragged from cars, threatened with guns, denied medical care, and held for days without access to a lawyer. Some of the victims were children. All were Americans. And the administration still claims it never occurs.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
550 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1642 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-05-22S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-05-20S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-20H.R. 1223 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-20H. Res. 426 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-20H. Res. 426 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-19H.R. 1286 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-19H.R. 1263 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-15H.R. 2240 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-15H.R. 2255 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 352 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-05-14H.R. 2243 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 405 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 405 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-14H.R. 2215 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-13H.R. 249 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-13H. Con. Res. 30 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-05-08H.R. 276 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-08H.R. 276 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-05-07H.R. 881 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-05-07H.R. 1503 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-06H. Res. 377 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-06H. Res. 377 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 36 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 530 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 78 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-29H.J. Res. 60 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 859 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 1442 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 1402 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-04-28S. 146 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-28H.R. 973 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 22 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 22 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 9 / 11Next →