Greg Landsman headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Ohio District 1
Born
December 4, 1976
Age 49
Phone
(202) 225-2216
Office
2244 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Ohio District 1

Greg Landsman

Gregory John Landsman is an American politician who has been the U.S. representative from Ohio's 1st congressional district since 2023. The district is based in Cincinnati, and includes most of its inner suburbs.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 550
Yes48%
No50%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align92%
Cross-party7%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Greg Landsman headshot
Greg Landsman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOhio District 1
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 26 sponsored · 137 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Our bipartisan bill to increase foreign investments in U.S. semiconductor manufacturing passed out of @energycommerce.bsky.social.  Making semiconductor chips in the U.S. will create good-paying jobs, secure our supply chains, and keep us safe.
Every day, NIOSH employees help protect workers from injury and illness. But Trump and Secretary Kennedy fired 1,500 of them, including over 400 from SW Ohio. That's why we sent a letter – backed by more than 100 of my colleagues and over a dozen labor organizations – calling on them to be rehired.
No wonder Trump is taxing cars and raising prices—it's because he doesn't care. @repgreglandsman.bsky.social & Rep. Marc Veasey discuss Trump's tariffs on cars in this deleted scene from this week's episode of "The Fly-In." Watch the full episode on Youtube or wherever you stream podcasts.
Every family should be able to afford their child’s insulin. Today, we reintroduced the Making Insulin Affordable for All Children Act to cap insulin costs at $35/month for kids and young adults. No parent should have to choose between buying groceries and buying insulin.
New episode of "The Fly-In" just dropped. We talked: ➡️3 crazy bills that attack judges, voting rights, and increase overdraft fees. ➡️ @booker.senate.gov's powerful, history-making floor speech. ➡️Speaker sending us home in protest over a vote on new moms voting by proxy.
In episode 3 of "The Fly-In," hosts @repgreglandsman.bsky.social and Rep. Marc Veasey are joined by @pettersen.house.gov to discuss how her bill to allow new parents to proxy vote broke Speaker Mike Johnson, and more. Watch on YouTube or wherever you stream podcasts. youtu.be/JX8NAc2Vg0E?...
We’re no longer voting on these bills this week because the Speaker sent us home. He sent us home because he didn’t want to let new parents vote by proxy. Insane.
This week the Republican majority is having us vote on bills to: 1️⃣ Undermine federal judges 2️⃣ Make it harder for millions of Americans to vote 3️⃣ Increase costs I’m a hard no on all three.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
550 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderNONOPassed
2025-07-15H.R. 1717 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-14S. 1596 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1770 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1709 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H.R. 1 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 275 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 875 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-06-25H. Res. 519 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as AmendedYESYESPassed
2025-06-24Motion to AdjournNOYESFailed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 537 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3422 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3394 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 1998 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-12Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-12S. 331 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 884 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 2096 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 481 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 488 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESNOPassed
2025-06-09H.R. 2035 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-06H.R. 2966 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 11Next →