This president and our Congress must stand with our democratic ally, and stand up against the brutal dictator, Putin.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Ohio District 1
Greg Landsman
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes48%
No50%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align92%
Cross-party7%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Greg Landsman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOhio District 1
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 26 sponsored · 137 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Our democratic ally lays out the path to ending Putin’s war. 👇🏼
www.nytimes.com/2025/03/04/w...
Thank you to folks in East Westwood for a thoughtful and productive community conversation. 🙏🏻💙
There is so much to tackle right now, but we want to highlight Ken’s story, our first bill this year to tackle high prices, and the need to focus on getting costs down.
SW Ohioan Ken Green will join us for tomorrow’s Joint Address to Congress.
Ken has lived with Type 1 diabetes his entire life and knows firsthand the impact of high prescription drugs costs.
We joined over 200 House Democrats to sign on an amicus brief defending the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
We’re taking action on every front, including the courts, because congressional Republicans, who control everything, are doing nothing.
All of this is going to happen in the Energy and Commerce Committee. I'm on that committee, and I'm going to do everything in my power to stop these cuts.
If they eliminated the tax giveaways to the top 2% of wage earners, that would save $2.4 trillion.
They don't have to cut your healthcare.
They don't have to do this. There's a better way.
I have proposed that 100% of all tax relief should go to the middle class, working people, farmers, and small businesses.
Even if you don't lose your healthcare, you could be impacted.
When you take that much money out of the healthcare system, you are going to see hospitals and services within hospitals shuttering their doors.
Many hospitals are operating with just a few days of revenue. That's it.
Ohio is a state that has trigger laws.
If the federal share of Medicaid drops below 90%, all of the folks covered under Medicaid expansion will lose their healthcare.
Over 770,000 Ohioans will lose their healthcare. Immediately.
The healthcare program they're going to focus on is Medicaid.
2.4 million Ohioans rely on this program—40% of whom are children.
They passed a budget last week.
In that budget, they have promised to cut $880 billion in healthcare to pay for tax giveaways to billionaires and big corporations.
Imagine you lost your healthcare. It may happen with Trump’s budget plan.
5 things you should know 🧵👇🏻
We’re witnessing a hostile takeover of the federal government. They’re indiscriminately firing people and withholding hundreds of billions from our communities.
We’re not going to be quiet about this, or the need for the Republican-controlled Congress to step up and stop this.Re
Debbie went to work every day at the Cincinnati VA to find and hire doctors for our sick veterans.
Last week, she got an email from Elon Musk saying she no longer had a job.
It’s a Russia First policy and their fixation with dictators over democracies is insane - and ultimately very, very dangerous.
Ramadan Mubarak to everyone in SW Ohio and around the world who are observing. 🙏🏼💙
In the middle of a housing crisis, they’re withholding money to build more housing - and indiscriminately firing people leading this work.
We need answers, and this Republican-controlled Congress to step up and demand this chaos end.
We signed onto this letter to get answers:
Today, we introduced a bipartisan bill to strengthen cybersecurity and keep our communication networks safe—especially when they’re needed to respond to national security threats.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | PRESENT | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.