Yes, the information in the Signal group chat was classified.
Yes, this could have put our servicemembers in harm’s way.
No, Hegseth and Waltz have not learned their lesson.
And no, they are not capable of continuing to serve in their roles.
They need to RESIGN.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Washington
Patty Murray
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 789
Yes23%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting6%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Patty Murray
U.S. SenatorDemocratWashington
SoupScore
Patty's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 35 sponsored · 165 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Public pressure works—yes even on the Trump administration. We need to get them to scrap this awful policy altogether. Seniors deserve to be able to talk to a REAL PERSON over the phone to get the benefits they're entitled to. Let's keep fighting to protect Social Security!
Trump & Musk are tossing life-saving research into the shredder—and the consequences will be devastating for treatment for childhood cancers, a cure for Alzheimer's, and so much more.
Does cutting off cancer research make sense to anyone?
I'm just thinking about when our former Vice President mentioned that she wasn't texting so much on the job.
Today I spoke with Laura who's worked at Social Security for 30+ years to help people get their hard-earned benefits—but she's leaving because of the nonstop attacks on the Social Security workforce by Musk.
By driving out people like Laura, Elon is breaking Social Security.
@emd.wa.gov does essential work to keep the people of WA state safe when disaster strikes. I met with the Director to hear firsthand how Trump's illegal freeze on federal funding is undermining the agency's critical work.
Secretary Hegseth put classified military plans into an unsecured group chat with a random journalist, putting the lives of our servicemembers at risk, & then he LIED about it.
Pete Hegseth must RESIGN.
Michael Waltz must RESIGN.
They cannot be trusted to keep America safe.
We need an FDA Commissioner who will put science over politics to protect the health and safety of all Americans.
That means opposing far-right efforts to restrict safe & effective medication abortion—at minimum.
I voted NO on Dr. Makary to lead the FDA.
Oh good! While Trump & Elon cut lifesaving research, they’re going to put our very limited federal resources towards studying the conspiracy theory that vaccines cause autism.
These people are doing less CANCER RESEARCH to waste your taxpayer dollars on total bunk.
Women are paid 75 cents on the dollar compared to men—and it's even worse for black and Latina women.
And it’s not just a few cents at stake. This injustice compounds over time, robbing women of huge, life-changing amounts of money over the course of their careers.
This administration is taking a wrecking ball to cutting-edge medical research and innovation—destroying lifesaving cures for cancer, Alzheimer's, and more
Dr. Bhattacharya will not protect NIH research from Elon & Trump. I voted NO.
My former preschool students could follow instructions better than our country's top national security officials—AND they'd know to be honest and apologize for their mistakes.
But this isn't preschool—it's our national security, and the lives of our servicemembers are at risk.
I met with leaders from Coulee Medical Center—which serves remote, rural communities in eastern WA.
House Republicans' plans to gut Medicaid would have devastating consequences for rural providers and patients—and I will do everything I can to fight back.
Freezing Title X funding that helps women get cancer screenings, birth control & pregnancy tests, STI treatment, and more is ILLEGAL and will put women's lives at risk.
Trump & Elon don't care how many women suffer from their deranged mission to attack anything they deem DEI.
Republicans are firing Social Security workers and pushing staff to leave en masse.
Republicans are shuttering SSA offices across the country.
Republicans are jamming up the phone lines and wait times.
All of this is just another way of cutting Social Security benefits.
It’s pretty simple: when you do the same work as a colleague, you should get paid the same—no matter your gender.
That's why I'm proud to reintroduce the Paycheck Fairness Act and keep leading the fight to end wage discrimination.
Trump & Elon illegally dismantling USAID & blocking funding is seriously hurting @onecampaign.bsky.social's work to improve global health & development. I heard from WA state members about what this means for communities at home & abroad.
This is a deadly serious failure—who knows what other classified information they are playing fast & loose with?
Many of these people should never have had their jobs to begin with & everyone involved needs to be held accountable immediately.
Americans' safety and security is at risk.
Elon & DOGE are lying about fraud and abuse at the Social Security Administration so you don't get mad when they cut YOUR hard-earned benefits.
Why?
So they can pass more tax cuts for billionaires.
Frank was a leader who really cared if people had health care and a roof over their heads—and he did everything in his power to lift families out of poverty.
My thoughts are with his family and loved ones. He will be missed greatly by everyone who knew him.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History789 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
789 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690) | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Amendment Rejected (5-94) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Amendment Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 26 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26 | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-83) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 33 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33 | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-82) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Joint Resolution Passed (53-42) |
| 2025-04-02 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-02 | S.J. Res. 37 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-48) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-03-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-03-27 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-48) |
| 2025-03-26 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.