6/ And while the Senate-passed bill allows states with the highest error rates to receive a 1 to 2 year delay, others—including Maine—would not receive any sort of relief.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maine District 1
Chellie Pingree
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes40%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Chellie Pingree
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaine District 1
SoupScore
Chellie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 161 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
5/ And it’s not just Maine.
Even the national average error rate is over 10%. This isn’t a “Maine problem”—it’s a systemic issue. Yet Republicans want states to foot the bill anyway.
4/ That tiny 0.26% would cost Maine BIG.
If this plan were in effect today, Maine would be hit with the maximum 15% cost share. That’s ~$100 million a year we’d have to come up with (or cut).
3/ Under their plan, if a state’s error rate is:
⬇️ Under 6% > no penalty
🔸 6–8% > 5% cost-share
🔸 8–10% > 10% cost-share
🔺 Over 10% > 15% cost-share
And guess what? Maine’s error rate for FY24 came in at 10.26%—*just* over the line.
2/ First: “payment error rates” don’t mean fraud.
They’re bureaucratic mistakes—like paperwork errors or miscalculations—not people gaming the system. But Republicans want to punish states for them anyway.
🧵1/ The GOP’s latest scheme would force states to pay for a share of SNAP food benefits based on “payment error rates.”
This would be catastrophic for states, including Maine. Here’s what you need to know. 👇
Now, it’s up to the House to stop this bill before it reaches the President’s desk. @housedemocrats.bsky.social will not back down from this fight.
The Senate just passed the most harmful and regressive piece of legislation I’ve seen during my time in Congress. It rips health care and food assistance from millions, explodes the deficit by trillions, and showers tax breaks on the ultra-wealthy.
Every one of these amendments was commonsense, pro-family, pro-worker, and fiscally responsible.
Instead, Republicans are fighting for giveaways to the ultra-rich—while slashing health care, energy savings, and child nutrition.
This is what their priorities look like. Americans deserve better.
❌ Block more tax cuts for millionaires + billionaires*
(*They blocked it four times.)
❌ Ensure the bill doesn’t blow a hole in the deficit
❌ Prevent Medicaid cuts for labor + delivery units—especially in rural areas
❌ Protect nutrition assistance for kids under 12
❌ Cut prescription drug costs
❌ Expand Medicare coverage to include dental, vision, and hearing
🧵
For the past 24 hours, Senate Democrats have brought amendment after amendment to the floor, fighting to improve this disaster of a bill.
So far, Senate Republicans have voted down amendments to:
❌ Protect low energy costs for families and small businesses
Watch our full discussion:
youtu.be/cfW0B5gFCmg?...
Trump's “Big Beautiful Bill” is nothing more than a big, ugly handout to the wealthy that rips away food and health care from those who need it most.
@mecep.bsky.social expert @jamesxmyall.bsky.social breaks down how this upside-down bill will impact Mainers 👇
It’s hard to fathom how this bill could get any worse, but the Senate found a way.
It guts Medicaid + SNAP. Sabotages clean energy. Spends $85 million on *moving a space shuttle to Texas*. All while ballooning the deficit by trillions.
The House could vote on this disaster as soon as Wednesday.
When we say #NoKings, we mean it.
That spirit of resistance was on full display two weeks ago. Everywhere I went, I was amazed by the turnout. By the passion and conviction. By the community and camaraderie.
I know this much: No Administration—no matter how lawless—can keep us Mainers down. (7/7)
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.