At a Glance

Seat

Representative for Maine District 1

Born

April 2, 1955

Age 71

Phone

(202) 225-6116

Office

2354 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maine District 1

Chellie Pingree

Chellie Pingree is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for Maine's 1st congressional district since 2009. Her district includes most of the southern part of the state, centered around the Portland area.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown

Loading…

Voting Record — 550

Yes40%

No55%

Present1%

Not Voting5%

Party align98%

Cross-party1%

SoupScore

District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Social & Web

Official site Bluesky X @ChelliePingree Facebook Instagram YouTube

External Resources

Wikipedia Ballotpedia VoteSmart GovTrack OpenSecrets

Chellie Pingree

U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaine District 1

SoupScore

Chellie's ATmosphere Activity

20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 161 cosponsored

View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 28(source)

Right around the corner from my District Office, in one of the oldest buildings on the wharf, is a place called King’s Head Pub. There, you’ll find a facsimile mural depicting the burning of Falmouth. When it comes to fighting against tyranny, New Englanders never forget. (6/7)

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 28(source)

In the end, the colonies came together and, after years of bloody struggle, won their independence. It took years for Falmouth to rebuild. But its role as a hotbed of resistance and resilience was forever cemented. In the people and political energy of modern Portland, that legacy lives on (5/7)

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 28(source)

Word quickly spread through the colonies about the King’s awful assault on civilians. The attack was so shocking that, within weeks, the Continental Congress authorized its own navy. It soon became clear that the war wasn’t just about taxation and representation, but about life and liberty. (4/7)

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 28(source)

That fall, the British Navy returned to Falmouth with a fleet of warships. Their message: surrender or else. The townspeople refused. On October 18, British ships bombarded the town. Then they went ashore—and burned down most of the buildings. It was one of the most brutal acts of the war. (3/7)

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 28(source)

After the battles of Lexington and Concord in April 1775, the conflict quickly escalated. At the time, Falmouth (now Portland) was one of the busiest ports in New England. That summer, local militia fired on a Royal Navy ship trying to enforce the King's blockade. He didn’t appreciate it. (2/7)

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 28(source)

Two weeks ago, we saw the largest protests in U.S. history. For those who oppose this Administration’s illegal actions, #NoKings has become a rallying cry. So I thought I’d share a story that highlights the origins of that slogan—and one city’s outsized role in the American Revolution. (1/7)

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 27(source)

Threatening to deport someone because you disagree with their policies is grossly un-American—and conjures images of some of the most horrific regimes. I stand with Zohran, my Muslim-American colleagues, and everyone who believes this kind of racism and hatred have no place in our country. Ever.

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 27(source)

Mamdani won the Democratic Primary in New York City because he ran a hopeful campaign that connected with people of every race and identity, in every borough, and spoke to the issues they care about—like food and housing costs. That kind of energy and enthusiasm should be celebrated. Not vilified.

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 27(source)

The hatred and xenophobia displayed here, from a sitting member of Congress, is absolutely disgusting. Sadly, such racism and bigotry toward Muslim-Americans—including Muslim-American political leaders—is hardly uncommon. Some of my colleagues have endured similar vitriol. It makes my blood boil.

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 27(source)

Now more than ever, we need state and local action—legal and otherwise—to combat this Administration’s lawlessness. We need a Congress that’s willing to reclaim its power and hold these people accountable. And we need a Supreme Court that will actually uphold the Constitution. (8/8)

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 27(source)

Bottom line: This ruling is a gift to the Administration—and a green light for Trump to sign even more outrageous Executive Orders, knowing the courts won’t be able to keep up and Republicans in Congress will continue letting him go unchallenged. (7/8)

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 27(source)

This ruling also has profound implications for Congress. With the Judicial branch forfeiting its own power, it'll be more difficult to keep Trump in check. And when the majority party simply rubber stamps whatever he says, oversight and accountability are gone. We’re seeing that now. (6/8)

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 27(source)

If you took high school civics, you probably remember Marbury v. Madison, the landmark 1803 ruling that established “judicial review”—the idea that the courts should have a say in the constitutionality of actions taken by the other branches of government. That’s in serious jeopardy now. (5/8)

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 27(source)

Without nationwide injunctions, states or groups must litigate their cases individually. This will inevitably slow the pace of legal challenges and weaken oversight of the Executive branch. tldr: Using the judiciary to push back against this Administration just got a whole lot harder. (4/8)

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 27(source)

What it *does* mean is that an injunction issued by a lower court should only apply to the plaintiff(s) in that case. That might sound sensible. But when you have an Administration like this—that churns out illegal and unconstitutional executive orders like a factory—it’s a huge problem. (3/8)

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 27(source)

First, it’s important to note that this decision *does not* mean Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship is itself constitutional. (The 14th Amendment clearly states any person born in the United States is, in fact, a citizen.) That fight may well be coming. But we’re not there yet. (2/8)

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 27(source)

🧵 Today's SCOTUS decision barring lower courts from issuing nationwide injunctions to block executive actions is truly alarming. The implications—for Congress, the separation of powers, and our democracy—are disastrous. Justice Jackson called it “an existential threat to the rule of law.” (1/8)

Supreme Court limits nationwide injunctions, but fate of Trump birthright citizenship order unclear

A divided Supreme Court has ruled that individual judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions, but the decision leaves unclear the fate of President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthr...

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 26(source)

I’m proud to join my colleagues in hanging a replica plaque outside my office. Republicans want to forget what happened on January 6. But we never will. The 140 officers who were beaten never will. The families of those who lost their lives never will. And neither will the American people.

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 26(source)

It’s a violation of federal law—and an insult to those who put their lives on the line. Today, during an Appropriations markup, Democrats pleaded with our Republican colleagues to adopt an amendment to ensure the plaque finally goes up. They voted it down. What happened to "Back the Blue"?

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree@pingree.house.govJun 26(source)

🧵 Three years ago, Democrats and Republicans came together to honor the police officers who defended us, the Capitol, and democracy on January 6, passing a bill to create and hang a plaque in the Capitol honoring their bravery. But Speaker Johnson has refused to allow the plaque to be displayed.

← Newer postsPosts page 66Older posts →

Sponsored Bills(22)

H.R. 7947 (119th)
Agricultural Management Assistance Act of 2026
H.R. 7743 (119th)
To provide for a limitation on the obligation of funds for certain immigration enforcement p…
H.R. 7708 (119th)
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to require the Secretary of Homeland Security t…
H. Res. 1027 (119th)
Supporting the designation of the "International Year of the Woman Farmer" to recognize and …
H.R. 7267 (119th)
To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the provision of produce prescriptions t…

Cosponsored Bills(161)

H.R. 8967 (119th)
To provide for an extension of the rural community hospital demonstration program.
Joined: 2026-05-21
H. Con. Res. 103 (119th)
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove Un…
Joined: 2026-05-20
H. Res. 1301 (119th)
Supporting the designation of May 29, 2026, as "Mental Health Awareness in Agriculture Day" …
Joined: 2026-05-19
H.R. 8518 (119th)
To provide for the discharge of parent borrower liability if a student on whose behalf a par…
Joined: 2026-04-27
H. Res. 1212 (119th)
Expressing support for the staff of public, school, academic, and special libraries in the U…
Joined: 2026-04-23

Leadership

No leadership roles

Committees

SoupScore Breakdown

Loading analysis metrics…

Voting History

550 total votes

ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

Date	Bill	Question	Position	Party Maj	Align?	Result
2025-02-26	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-02-26	H.R. 804 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-26	H.R. 788 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-25	H. Res. 161 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-02-25	H. Res. 161 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-02-25	H.R. 818 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-25	H.R. 832 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-24	H.R. 825 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-13	H.R. 35 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-02-12	H.R. 77 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-02-12	H.R. 77 (119th)	Send back to committee	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-02-11	H. Res. 122 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-02-11	H. Res. 122 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-02-10	H.R. 736 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-10	H.R. 692 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-07	H.R. 26 (119th)	Final passage	NOT_VOTING	NO	—	Passed
2025-02-07	H.R. 26 (119th)	Send back to committee	NOT_VOTING	YES	—	Failed
2025-02-06	H.R. 27 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-02-06	H.R. 27 (119th)	Approve amendment	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-02-05	H. Res. 93 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-02-05	H. Res. 93 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-02-05	H.R. 776 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-02-04	H.R. 43 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-23	H.R. 21 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-01-23	H.R. 21 (119th)	Send back to committee	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-01-23	H.R. 471 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-01-23	H.R. 375 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-22	S. 5 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-01-22	H.R. 165 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-22	H. Res. 53 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-01-22	H. Res. 53 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-01-22	H.R. 187 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-21	H.R. 186 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-16	H.R. 30 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-01-16	H.R. 30 (119th)	Send back to committee	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-01-15	H.R. 33 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-15	H.R. 144 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-15	H.R. 164 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-14	H.R. 28 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-01-14	H.R. 28 (119th)	Send back to committee	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-01-14	H.R. 153 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-14	H.R. 152 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-13	H.R. 192 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-01-09	H.R. 23 (119th)	Final passage	NOT_VOTING	NO	—	Passed
2025-01-07	H.R. 29 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-01-03	H. Res. 5 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-01-03	H. Res. 5 (119th)	Motion to Commit with Instructions	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-01-03	H. Res. 5 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-01-03	—	Election of the Speaker	NOT_VOTING	—	—	Johnson (LA)
2025-01-03	—	Call by States	PRESENT	—	—	Passed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 11