Chellie Pingree headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Maine District 1
Born
April 2, 1955
Age 71
Phone
(202) 225-6116
Office
2354 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maine District 1

Chellie Pingree

Chellie Pingree is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for Maine's 1st congressional district since 2009. Her district includes most of the southern part of the state, centered around the Portland area.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 550
Yes40%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Chellie Pingree headshot
Chellie Pingree
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaine District 1
SoupScore
Chellie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 161 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

President Trump has once again bypassed Congress and undermined democratic norms by forcing through sweeping changes by executive order. This reckless move to consolidate wildfire response programs—right before the height of fire season—is irresponsible and dangerous.
If they can assault a sitting Senator with impunity, imagine what they can do to ordinary citizens.  I stand with Senator Padilla. We need answers, we need accountability, and we need to send a clear message to the Administration that this kind of thuggish behavior will not be tolerated. (2/2)
What happened to Senator Padilla today was disgraceful, completely uncalled for, and an alarming abuse of power. He had every right to be there—in that room, in that federal building, in a city he represents—and to question Secretary Noem about the government’s recent actions and policies. (1/2)
Longer video of the forcible removal, detainment, and arrest of Sen. Alex Padilla by the Trump regime during a DHS press conference. Footage provided by Sen. Padilla's team.
Today, @democrats-appropriations.house.gov are pushing back on Republicans’ massive defense funding bill that weakens Ukraine and empowers Russia. Soon, the House will take up the President’s $9 billion rescissions package, which would defund USAID and public media like NPR and PBS. (1/2)
Farmers kept their promises. USDA didn’t. After Trump illegally froze funding for critical ag programs, farmers in Maine and across the country were left hanging—fronting costs, only to be met with silence. My amendment would right this wrong, and ensure USDA honors its contracts.
The climate crisis is real. Drought, flooding, early frosts that can ruin an apple crop—our farmers are living with this every season. But Republicans would rather sneer about “woke agendas” than fund the tools that help people keep their farms in business—and keep food on our tables.
Republicans love to talk about standing up for farmers and making America healthy. Then why are they cutting programs that help farmers bring healthy produce to their communities? During today’s Ag markup, @democrats-appropriations.house.gov are the ones actually fighting for America’s farmers.
While Republicans sat in silence, @democrats-appropriations.house.gov worked thru the night fighting for veterans. We scored wins for vets affected by Agent Orange, and for those at risk of suicide. But many important provisions were rejected. Our fight continues today with Ag-FDA. Stay tuned.
The Produce Rx Program helps vets access healthy food, manage chronic illness, + stay out of the hospital. We’ve funded it for 4yrs—and it’s working. But Republicans want to eliminate it. How is that “MAHA”? This program supports veterans health and wellbeing. It isn’t complicated!
We’re on hour 7 of marking up the MilVon VA appropriations bill. @democrats-appropriations.house.gov have introduced dozens of amendments like this one to fight back against Republicans’ shortsighted and reckless cuts and we’re only about halfway through. We will keep fighting.
Upholding our NATO commitments shouldn’t be controversial. But in a MAGA-led Congress, even that’s upside-down. Putin couldn’t have drawn it up better. Peace through strength is standing side by side with our allies. We must fund NATO. Period.
Upholding our NATO commitments shouldn’t be controversial. But in a MAGA-led Congress, even that’s upside-down. Putin couldn’t have drawn it up better. Peace through strength is standing side by side with our allies. We must fund NATO. Period.
The MilCon-VA bill is a total disaster—not just for veterans (and women especially), but for our shipyards. At Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, rising sea levels are threatening nuclear submarines. But Republicans want to cut resilience funding. Why? Because “climate resilience” is too woke. Seriously.
We know how bad the Big Ugly Bill is. It gets worse. Today we begin markups for the Republican '26 budget, starting w/ their awful MilCon-VA bill. 🚨 Resilience funding for Portsmouth Naval Shipyard? Gone. 🚨 80K VA jobs? Cut. 🚨 Women veterans’ rights? Stripped. 🚨 Healthy food for patients? Nope!
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
550 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-11-20H.R. 6019 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 4058 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5107 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5214 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H. Res. 888 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 80 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 130 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 888 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESFailed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-11-18H.R. 4405 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESFailed
2025-11-18H.R. 2659 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-17H.R. 1608 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-13H.R. 5371 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-11-12H. Res. 873 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-19H. Res. 719 (119th)Approve resolutionPRESENTYESPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-18H.R. 1047 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3015 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3062 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 713 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5143 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5125 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 5140 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 4922 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 2721 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-15H.R. 3400 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-15H.J. Res. 117 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3486 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3944 (119th)Instruct negotiatorsYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNOT_VOTINGNOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 11Next →