Trump didn't look for experience when choosing his cabinet—he looked for blind loyalty.
We need a government that serves the people, not a king.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Illinois District 5
Mike Quigley
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes43%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align98%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 5
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Quigley
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratIllinois District 5
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 144 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
It's always great spending the day with our friends at Nourishing Hope, passing out some food, and paying it forward.
Investing in Chicago’s transportation is investing in our future.
I'm proud to have secured nearly $300 million for the CREATE program, to keep our city moving and our communities connected.
Trump said he could end the war on day one. The only way he can do that is by handing Ukraine over to Putin. For the sake of the free world, we can't let that happen.
Contraception access is fundamental to women's freedom. Democrats won't allow extremists to turn back the clock on women's rights.
Democrats promised to lower healthcare costs, and we delivered.
In Illinois, 2.4 million seniors and other Medicare beneficiaries will save money on prescription drug costs.
Trump's cabinet picks seem to prioritize loyalty over expertise. The country needs experienced, unbiased leaders—not a team of sycophants.
Democracy thrives when we protect it. We must do everything in our power to preserve our democratic institutions and safeguard them from tyrants.
Want to stay informed on my work in Washington?
Sign up for text messages by texting "QUIGLEY" to (773) 200-2854.
Home and rental prices are simply too high for most Americans.
We must tackle the housing crisis and ensure everyone has a safe, affordable place to call home.
Too many Americans are struggling to make ends meet. I’m committed to lowering costs, tackling corporate greed, and raising wages to ensure a fair shot for everyone.
IVF allows millions of Americans to start a family.
We can't let extremists rip that right away.
When it comes to Matt Gaetz, I hope the Senate has greater loyalty to the American people than blind loyalty to Donald J. Trump.
I urge the Biden Administration to remain steadfast in its commitment to sanctioning those responsible for settlement activities.
The Admin must also apply pressure to those who have not only facilitated the development of these settlements but have also recently advocated for their expansion.
Now more than ever, we must prioritize de-escalation over exacerbating suffering and violence. The ongoing construction of settlements only deepens instability and poses a significant threat to achieving a two-state solution.
I commend the Biden Administration for imposing sanctions against settlements in the West Bank, a vital step toward holding settlers accountable while discouraging further expansion.
Tulsi Gabbard is a Kremlin media darling who cannot be trusted as Director of National Intelligence.
The Senate must decide what matters more—protecting America’s safety or catering to Donald Trump.
Today, we remember the lives that were stolen at Club Q in Colorado Springs two years ago.
Attacks against LGBTQI+ Americans are on the rise. We must do everything in our power to stop the hatred and prevent violence.
I stand firmly with Congresswoman-elect McBride against this hateful and unnecessary effort.
She deserves the same rights as everyone else—period. We must ensure that trans Americans are protected from these cruel attacks.
The American people have a right to hear what the House Ethics Committee knows about Matt Gaetz.
I just sent a letter to the Ethics Committee demanding they release their report.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 11 / 11