Jacky Rosen headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Nevada
Born
August 2, 1957
Age 68
Phone
(202) 224-6244
Office
713 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Nevada

Jacky Rosen

Jacklyn Sheryl Rosen is an American politician serving as the junior United States senator from Nevada since 2019. A member of the Democratic Party, she was the U.S. representative for Nevada's 3rd congressional district from 2017 to 2019.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 825
Yes38%
No61%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align90%
Cross-party10%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jacky Rosen headshot
Jacky Rosen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNevada
SoupScore
Jacky's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 67 sponsored · 221 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I remain hopeful that the war will end soon, securing the release of all remaining hostages, ensuring Israel’s long-term security, and ending civilian suffering once and for all. (3/3)
For the last two agonizing years, I have met with freed hostages and loved ones of those still in captivity and unceasingly pushed for their safe return. I am in awe of their bravery. (2/3)
On October 7, 2023, Hamas carried out the deadliest attack against the Jewish people since the Holocaust. Terrorists murdered innocent civilians and took hundreds more men, women, and children hostage. (1/3)
Health insurance premiums are about to double for millions of Americans. Trump and Washington Republicans can stop it. They’re keeping the government shut down instead.
Glad to hear President Trump is now ready to make a deal to prevent a spike in health care costs and finally end this Republican shutdown. He needs to bring Republicans in Congress to the table to get it done.
Health insurance premiums are about to go up by thousands of dollars a year for millions of American families.   Congress has the power to stop this. We need Washington Republicans to join us, end the shutdown, and put people over politics.
Our health care system is broken. Accessing care is already too expensive for far too many Americans. The last thing we should be doing is making premiums even higher – but Washington Republicans shut down the government to do just that. We won’t let them get away with it.
Dems introduced a bill to reopen the government and prevent a huge health care cost hike for millions of Americans. Every Senate Republican voted against it. Washington Republicans have the power to end this shutdown and address the health care crisis. They need to come to the table and negotiate.
Washington Republicans bent over backwards to give more tax breaks to billionaires. Why would they rather shut down the government than work with us to stop YOUR health insurance premiums from doubling?
Wishing a meaningful fast to Jewish communities observing Yom Kippur in Nevada and across the world. I hope this day serves as an opportunity for solemn reflection and paves the way for a peaceful new year ahead. G’mar chatimah tovah.
Republicans are in control of Congress and the White House. They could’ve prevented a government shutdown, but refused to stop a massive spike in health care costs for millions of Americans. They own this shutdown.
Donald Trump wants to use $20 billion of your money to bail out Argentina. But here at home, prices are up, employment is down, and we’re on the brink of a shutdown because he won’t address the health care crisis.
Over 100,000 Nevadans get their health insurance through Nevada Health Link – and when enhanced premium tax credits expire at the end of this year, costs will go up and tens of thousands of people could eventually lose coverage. Congress must act NOW to protect Nevadans’ access to care.
As your U.S. Senator, I’ll always work to deliver for our state – and the Nevada Association of Counties has consistently been a great partner. Thanks to NACO for having me, and for all the incredible work you do on behalf of Nevadans.
I had a great discussion with Urban Chamber of Commerce leaders about how we can continue working together to support Las Vegas’ incredible small businesses and make sure they have the resources they need to succeed.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
825 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (61-35)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-07-22H.R. 3944 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (91-7, 3/5 majority required)
2025-07-22H.R. 3944 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-48)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-21End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (44-43)
2025-07-17End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (46-36)
2025-07-17End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-34)
2025-07-17End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-31)
2025-07-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2025-07-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-43)
2025-07-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (51-48)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (51-47)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (47-50)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (47-52)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-07-15H.R. 4 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-07-15H.R. 4 (119th)Motion to Discharge H.R. 4NONOMotion to Discharge Agreed to (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-07-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-47)
2025-07-15End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-46)
2025-07-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-07-15End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-15Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (69-30)
2025-07-14End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-28)
2025-07-14Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (46-42)
2025-07-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-07-10End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2025-07-10End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-07-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-45)
2025-07-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-46)
2025-07-09End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-44)
2025-07-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-07-09End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 9 / 17Next →