On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court decided Trump v. CASA, Inc., a trio of consolidated cases in which the Court limited the ability of federal courts to issue nationwide injunctions—court orders against the government that prevent the government from implementing a challenged law, regulation, or other policy against…
Read the report ↗No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Congressional Activities
Source-heavy congressional process material lives here so the main bill summary can stay focused. Use this tab for committee scheduling, hearings, CRS analysis, committee publications, and amendment text.
CRS Reports
Nonpartisan Congressional Research Service analysis linked directly to this bill.
CRS analysis
Nonpartisan background and policy analysis tied directly to this bill.
In recent years, litigation over actions of the federal executive branch has prompted discussion of the authority of federal courts to halt or prevent the enforcement of executive branch policies. One particular focus of this discussion is nationwide injunctions—court orders against the government that prevent the gov…
Committee Meetings
Scheduled or recent committee meetings that mention this bill, plus agenda materials and witness documents.
Committee meetings
RecentHearings
Hearings, transcripts, and related meeting references associated with this bill.
No hearings linked to this bill yet.
Committee Reports
Formal committee rationale and report language published for this bill.
NO ROGUE RULINGS ACT OF 2025
Committee Prints
Working packets, committee print materials, and related draft text.
No committee prints linked to this bill yet.
Amendments
Structured amendment records, latest actions, vote references, and text links.
Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 294, the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill is considered adopted.
Latest action: On agreeing to the Rules amendment (A001) Agreed to without objection.