Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Massachusetts District 4
Jake Auchincloss
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 595
Yes44%
No51%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align96%
Cross-party3%
Jake Auchincloss
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMassachusetts District 4
SoupScore
Jake's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 11 sponsored · 89 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
As a dad, I am outmatched by the tech executives who get richer each minute my children spend staring at a screen. But as a member of the congressional committee with jurisdiction over social media, I am fighting back hard.
I am excited to work with Members on both sides of the aisle to pass impactful legislation.
I will be serving on the Health, Energy, and Environment subcommittees on the House Committee on Energy & Commerce. These subcommittees have jurisdiction over a range of issues critical to Bay Staters, from drug-pricing to clean energy to PFAS remediation.
SLB will be violating U.S. law if it continues to provide oilfield services to Russia.
auchincloss.house.gov/news/in-the-...
Congratulations to the winner, Sophia Evans of Norfolk, who built an app that allows users to post and find environmental clean-up events in their neighborhood. Clean coding and a wonderful way to improve our towns and meet our neighbors.
The next generation knows that Web 2.0's version of social media, which foments tribalism, does not need to remain the status quo. Seeing students build better on the same day that TikTok lost oral arguments at the Supreme Court felt like an inflection point to me.
I was heartened this year to see many of the apps focus on building community, including one that brokered civil discourse on political issues and another that coached young people on how to socialize better.
Every year, middle and high schoolers can submit apps to the Congressional App Challenge. We hosted the students & their parents at the Newton district office to see demos and announce the winner.
Today's Federal Trade Commission report must galvanize Congress to finally end the abuses of drug-pricing middlemen.
Specialty steering is a one-two punch of price-gouging and self-dealing in which pharmacy benefit managers mark-up the price of generic medicines and then steer the reimbursement towards affiliated pharmacies. It raises premiums for everybody. youtube.com/shorts/18jjf...
My statement on H.R. 28, the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act.
With tighter restrictions finally in place, Congress must keep up the pressure on Trump to insist that India respect the sanctions and stop funding the war in Ukraine through its oil imports.
For three years, I have been pressing for tougher oil sanctions on Russia, including by leading bipartisan pressure on India to stop importing Russian oil.
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
I wish Trump were as tough on Putin as he is on Panama.
youtu.be/pDyZcLILXrE
I didn’t co-lead the TikTok bill just as a Member of the China Select Committee. I am also one of the youngest parents in Congress. I’m in a race to rein in these social media corporations from attention-fracking our kids.
youtu.be/KtK9KzNsryg
Justice Jackson ftw – TikTok can continue to operate, it just can't let its algorithm answer to the Chinese Communist Party.
My statement on HR 29, the Laken Riley Act:
Ten years ago, I commanded a mission in Panama where my troops & I trained, patrolled, and lived side-by-side with Panamanian Public Forces.
They are our allies, not our enemies.
youtu.be/mQgi22wF66s
Newsmax or MSNBC, I'll go everywhere to talk about lowering Rx drug prices by reforming the drug-pricing middlemen known as PBMs. The bill is drafted, the bill is bipartisan, and the bill has the votes in the House & Senate. Speaker Johnson: bring up the bill!
youtu.be/4IKvXgea8do
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History595 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
595 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 5764 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-20 | H.R. 5763 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2312 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2270 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6504 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 2683 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-09 | H.R. 5184 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 1834 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 131 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 504 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.