Closing the gender pay gap would add billions to our economy.
Women are paid 75 cents for every $1 paid to a man - that's $14,170/year that could help hardworking families.
Let's pass the Paycheck Fairness Act – and do it now when our economy needs all the help it can get.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Maryland
Angela D. Alsobrooks
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 775
Yes29%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Angela D. Alsobrooks
U.S. SenatorDemocratMaryland
SoupScore
Angela D.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 28 sponsored · 217 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I was excited to join Delta for Women in Action for their day of advocacy!
My sorors are fired up and ready to stand up for hardworking families.
No matter what they throw at us, they can never extinguish our torch.
Hold on to your wallets.
This is all by design.
Trump and Musk want your Social Security checks to pay for tax cuts for billionaires.
Joined my sorors at the 36th Annual Delta Days at the Nation's Capital Social Action Luncheon.
The moral arc of the universe may be long, but we - my sorors - are the gravity that bends it toward justice.
We’re here, and we’re not going anywhere.
The ACA has delivered health care for 50 million Americans — including over 600,000 Marylanders.
Quality and affordable health care.
15 years ago today, the President and Congress delivered for hardworking American families. The way it should be.
Honored to meet with so many hardworking Maryland union members at our AFL-CIO Town Hall.
We have had some hard months. And while this Administration has made clear they stand with billionaires. Maryland knows I’m fighting for our workers — and I always will.
Firing public health officials is so dangerous.
I joined my colleagues in demanding that 750 CDC employees - people who keep our nation healthy and safe - be immediately reinstated.
These mass firings are going to cost lives.
www.reuters.com/business/hea...
Thank you Mark Anthony Thomas, President of the Greater Baltimore Committee (GBC) for hosting a conversation about the Baltimore region’s priorities.
I’m looking forward to continue working with the over 400 GBC members partners to keep delivering for the Baltimore region.
Had a meaningful conversation in Baltimore today at the Reginald F. Lewis Museum. I heard directly from local seniors, veterans, health care workers, artists, and parents about the issues impacting them and how I can support them.
Baltimore — I am fighting for you.
I met with the Eastern Shore Association of Municipalities and discussed concerns about frozen federal funds on projects from public safety to affordable housing.
I’m always willing to work with anyone for the benefit of Maryland.
We need to get this critical funding moving.
What a great morning meeting with agricultural leaders on the Eastern Shore. I am grateful to hear their concerns from frozen federal funds to the Avian Flu.
Thank you MD Agriculture Sec. Kevin Atticks! And special thank you to Layton’s Chance Vineyard and Winery for hosting us.
So who’s footing the bill for Republicans’ billionaire tax cut? The nearly 2 million Marylanders on Medicaid.
It’s abhorrent.
Honored to meet with over 30 pastors from across our state to hear about how the Trump Administration’s actions are impacting their congregations.
As a woman of faith, I am so grateful to be able to have this open dialogue with clergy who are leading our communities.
Great to tour Fort George G. Meade alongside COL. Yolanda Gore, 89th Garrison Commander of Fort Meade.
The work happening at Fort Meade from combat support to cybersecurity and so much more is protecting our national security and keeping Maryland and our nation safe.
Thank you BWI Thurgood Marshall for hosting us and giving an indepth briefing on the airport and facilities projects!
And a special thank you to Executive Director Ricky Smith - who is off to run the Atlanta airport. We are forever grateful for his service to Maryland.
Reposted bySenator Angela Alsobrooks
#MD02: I want to hear from you! 📢
Join me, @alsobrooks.senate.gov, @vanhollen.senate.gov, and retired Senator Ben Cardin for a virtual town hall tonight at 6 PM. We’ll discuss the President’s reckless actions and the harmful GOP budget bill. Tune in here: olszewski.house.gov/live
Had a great afternoon at the Prince George’s County Alumnae Chapter of Delta Sigma Theta’s 49th Annual Scholarship Benefit and Fashion Show.
Congratulations to all of the super amazing scholarship recipients!
Honored to join Prince George’s County African Diaspora Advisory Board’s 4th Annual International Women’s Day.
Thank you to the Chair of the African Diaspora Advisory Board Vincent Iweanoge. Maryland is stronger and more inclusive thanks to their work.
The unconscionable Republican CR cut $1 billion in funding for D.C. – funds that have literally already been paid for by D.C. residents.
So we introduced a bill tonight to ensure that D.C. receives the tax dollars it is owed. The Senate just passed it.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History775 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
775 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-39) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | S. 331 (119th) | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (78-19) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-32) |
| 2025-03-06 | S. 331 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-30) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-03-05 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-47) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-27) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-03 | S. 9 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 12 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 10 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (47-52) |
| 2025-02-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (54-44) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (66-28) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (24-76) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.