Angela D. Alsobrooks headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Maryland
Born
February 23, 1971
Age 55
Phone
(202) 224-4524
Office
374 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Maryland

Angela D. Alsobrooks

Angela Deneece Alsobrooks is an American lawyer and politician serving since 2025 as the junior United States senator from Maryland. A member of the Democratic Party, she served from 2011 to 2018 as state's attorney for Prince George's County and from 2018 to 2024 as county executive of Prince George's County. She was Prince George's County's first female county executive and the first Black female county executive in Maryland history.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 771
Yes29%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Angela D. Alsobrooks headshot
Angela D. Alsobrooks
U.S. SenatorDemocratMaryland
SoupScore
Angela D.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 28 sponsored · 216 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

The YWCA of Annapolis & Anne Arundel is on the front lines supporting survivors of domestic violence. I joined @vanhollen.senate.gov and @elfreth.house.gov to deliver $697,000 in federal funding to strengthen and expand their lifesaving work in Anne Arundel County.
The Supreme Court ruled the Admin’s disastrous tariffs are illegal and reaffirmed that Congress sets trade policy. I fought for tariff transparency and accountability from day one. We must refund Americans who were forced to pay for these illegal, chaotic, and arbitrary tariffs.
This Administration’s illegal and disastrous tariffs have hurt Marylanders – the families who have struggled every day to put food on the table, the farmers on the Eastern Shore, the small businesses in downtown Baltimore, the manufacturers in Mountain Maryland – and everyone in between. Finally, the Supreme Court ruled these tariffs are an unconstitutional tax on the American people, saying the President lacks authority to use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs. The Court reaffirmed that the power of the purse resides with Congress.

When I first came to the Senate one year ago, I knew I needed to act fast to hold the President and Republicans accountable for these disastrous tariffs. My first bill, the Tariff Transparency Act, would have required the Trump Administration to disclose the true cost of many of these tariffs to the American people. Republicans blocked it.
I continued to fight for Maryland businesses, farmers, and families in fighting against these tariffs – joining many amicus briefs at every step of the litigation process, including the Supreme Court case that led to today’s decision. 

Today’s decision reaffirms Congress’ responsibility to set trade policy. The Administration must work with Congress quickly to refund Marylanders for the money they have paid for tariffs that were chaotic, arbitrary, and now illegal.

Angela Alsobrooks
U.S. Senator for Maryland
I toured SURVICE Engineering in Belcamp, where they are helping advance cutting-edge drone technology. I was proud to secure federal funding that strengthens our national security and keeps Maryland at the forefront of research, development, and innovation.
I met with leaders from the Army Alliance, Aberdeen Proving Ground, and local partners in Aberdeen to learn about their vision for the future. Maryland plays a critical role in our national security, and I’m committed to advancing investments that strengthen our communities.
Public health suffers when fear keeps people from living their normal lives— from going to work, school, or the doctor. These ICE tactics are creating dangerous barriers that will harm our communities for years to come.
Article Title: Trump’s immigration crackdown is brewing a health care crisis in the US, doctors warn
By Lauren Mascarenhas
Image of masked ice agents walking down a street.
Caption: Minnesota doctors said the presence of federal immigration agents in the state was contributing to a health care crisis. Ryan Murphy/AP
I had an invigorating conversation with Cecil County businesses and County leadership hosted by the Cecil County Office of Economic Development. I heard about their successes, challenges, and opportunities. I will continue to fight for economic opportunity for all Marylanders.
Today, we lost a giant. Rev. Jesse Jackson dedicated his life to justice, dignity, and expanding who belongs in our democracy. We honor his legacy by carrying the work forward. Praying for Rep. Jonathan Jackson and the entire Jackson family.
This morning, our world lost a giant in Reverend Jesse Jackson. So many of us have the indelible black-and-white still images of Rev. Jackson fighting for justice in the Civil Rights Movement committed to memory. But keeping him there doesn’t do him justice. Rev. Jackson moved in living color, leaving his mark over decades of world history.

He marched with Dr. King in tireless pursuit of voting rights and civil rights for Black Americans. He ran for president and forever changed the face of electoral politics, giving a voice to the overlooked and unheard. He flew around the globe as a humanitarian, chasing injustice across oceans and borders.

He fought for the poverty stricken in rural America, and the poor living in our cities. He worked on behalf of farmers and labor unions. He protested for student rights and advocated for humane treatment of immigrants.
Whether you were imprisoned by injustice or indignity, he was there to remind you, ‘I am somebody.’ And time and time again, Rev. Jackson stood at the front, putting his own life at risk in an effort to liberate millions more. He lived his faith, driven by a moral conviction that civil rights, human rights, and economic justice together created a big tent that had room for everyone.

Rev. Jackson prepared generations to carry the torch forward. And at a time when our nation’s conscience doesn’t always speak as loudly as it should, and many of the fights that Rev. Jackson fought are still ongoing, his example shows us that the way to keep hope alive for enduring justice is through the work we’re willing to do for it.

My prayers are with my House colleague Rep. Jonathan Jackson and the entire Jackson family.
Republicans would rather shut down the government than rein in ICE – masked men killing Americans in broad daylight. We are asking for accountability – reveal the faces behind ICE and stop killing us – is that too much to ask? Apparently so.
A year into RFK Jr.’s disastrous run at HHS, the results are exactly what we thought: instability, dangerous misinformation, and weakened public health. I worked with @wyden.senate.gov on a 71-page report documenting the consequences of this chaotic year. Accountability matters.
I strongly condemn the antisemitic vandalism targeting Shaare Tefila Congregation. This was a vile and cowardly act. Houses of worship must be places of peace and safety, not targets of intimidation. I stand with the congregation as we work to hold those responsible accountable.
Olney synagogue defaced with antisemitic graffiti
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
771 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-10-15H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-44, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-14H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (49-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (77-20, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (10-88, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (51-46, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (53-43, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (14-83, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-10-09H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 106NONOJoint Resolution Passed (50-46)
2025-10-09H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-10-09H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2882 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-08H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 105NONOJoint Resolution Passed (50-45)
2025-10-08S.J. Res. 83 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 83YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (48-51)
2025-10-08S.J. Res. 71 (119th)Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 71YESYESJoint Resolution Defeated (47-51)
2025-10-08H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-10-08End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-47)
2025-10-08H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-08S. 2882 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-08H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 104NONOJoint Resolution Passed (52-47)
2025-10-07H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-10-07S. Res. 412 (119th)Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-10-06S. Res. 412 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-10-06H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-42, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-06S. 2882 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-03H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-44, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-03S. 2882 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-03S. Res. 412 (119th)Resolution S.Res. 412NONOResolution Agreed to (51-46)
2025-10-01S. Res. 412 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-10-01Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-10-01End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-10-01H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (55-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-01S. 2882 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-30H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Defeated (55-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-30S. 2882 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Defeated (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-29S. 2806 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (37-61, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-09-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-09-19Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (47-43)
2025-09-19End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (47-45)
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Defeated (44-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-19S. 2882 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Defeated (47-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-18Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-09-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-09-17Decision of the Chair PN12-19 and PN25-28 and PN12-45 and PN22-1 and PN22-2 and PN22-5 and PN22-27 and PN22-20 and PN22-21 and PN26-8 and PN26-34 and PN26-35 and PN55-41 and PN22-4 and PN22-8 and PN22-19 and PN26-1 and PN22-23 and PN25-40 and PN26-7 and PN26-19 and PN26-31 and PN60-3 and PN26-44 and PN25-2 and PN55-16 and PN60-9 and PN60-10 and PN129-8 and PN26-45 and PN141-37 and PN141-7 and PN141-28 and PN12-22 and PN25-21 and PN22-3 and PN26-22 and PN13-5 and PN22-24 and PN25-33 and PN141-18 and PN150-5 and PN345-16 and PN55-42 and PN54-6 and PN54-7 and PN55-45 and PN55-25YESYESDecision of Chair Not Sustained (47-52)
2025-09-17Motion to Reconsider PN55-25 and PN55-45 and PN54-7 and PN54-6 and PN55-42 and PN345-16 and PN150-5 and PN141-18 and PN25-33 and PN22-24 and PN13-5 and PN26-22 and PN22-3 and PN25-21 and PN12-22 and PN141-28 and PN141-7 and PN141-37 and PN26-45 and PN129-8 and PN60-10 and PN60-9 and PN55-16 and PN25-2 and PN26-44 and PN60-3 and PN26-31 and PN26-19 and PN26-7 and PN25-40 and PN22-23 and PN26-1 and PN22-19 and PN22-8 and PN22-4 and PN55-41 and PN26-35 and PN26-34 and PN26-8 and PN22-21 and PN22-20 and PN22-27 and PN22-5 and PN22-2 and PN22-1 and PN12-45 and PN12-19 and PN25-28NONOMotion to Reconsider Agreed to (51-47)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 16Next →