RFK Jr. must communicate his support for the vaccine to the American people, and put a stop to the misinformation and fear he's caused for parents across the country.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Colorado
Michael F. Bennet
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 885
Yes27%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting9%
Party align96%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Michael F. Bennet
U.S. SenatorDemocratColorado
SoupScore
Michael F.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 77 sponsored · 268 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Yesterday I got RFK Jr. to publicly admit that vaccines are safe and vital to protecting children’s health.
This new-found position comes after years of anti-vaccine rhetoric.
We must continue preserving Colorado’s natural beauty and quality of life for future generations.
Together, we have protected more than 700,000 acres of public lands, stopped Trump from selling off Colorado’s public lands, and connected ranchers, farmers, and local governments with federal wildfire support.
This Earth Day, Coloradans stand together in the fight for science, our communities, and our planet.
Sec. Kennedy spent decades sowing doubt about vaccines. Today, during my questioning, he admitted that the measles vaccine is critical to protecting children’s health.
He must now communicate his new-found support directly to the American people.
SOON: I'm going to question Sec. Kennedy on the conspiracy theories he's been peddling from his position as the most senior public health official in America.
He must answer for the damage he's done to erode public trust and public health — on behalf of families all across Colorado.
Tomorrow, RFK Jr. is back before the Senate to answer for the dangerous conspiracy theories he’s pushed from the highest seat in American public health.
His own testimony made clear he was unfit for this role from the start. He should never have been confirmed.
This legislation would allow the City of Ouray to repair the dam at Crystal Reservoir and restore a critical water supply, while keeping the land public for current residents and future generations to enjoy.
We're one step closer to passing this bill and protecting recreation access in Ouray.
Glad to work with Rep. Jeff Hurd to pass our bipartisan bill out of the House Natural Resources Committee.
coloradosun.com/2025/09/10/c...
From the coal camps of southern Colorado, these workers inspired a nationwide movement that won the labor protections we continue to defend today.
Today, we remember the Ludlow Massacre, when Colorado miners and their families were met with violence for daring to demand fair wages, safe conditions, and the right to organize.
RFK Jr. is returning to the Senate to answer for his disastrous approach to America's public health.
I was clear the last time I questioned him: Colorado families deserve better than his chaos and uncertainty.
On behalf of Coloradans, I won’t back down until we get the answers we need.
Today, Rep. Jason Crow and I introduced a resolution recognizing the 10th anniversary of Columbine Day of Service, recommitting to action and to a future where safety defines our schools.
As we witness ongoing gun violence across our country, we’re reminded that the work is far from over. This cannot be our normal for our kids.
27 years ago, Colorado and our communities were forever changed. We stand together to honor the young lives lost in the Columbine High School shooting, and the countless others whose lives have been forever impacted by gun violence.
I join Ross’s hometown of Durango in honoring his legacy and continued work to make skiing more accessible for everyone.
Today, we celebrate Ross Anderson: the fastest skier in American history.
Ross was the first Native American to compete in the speed skiing world championships, inspiring a generation of Indigenous athletes to take up the sport.
Trump started his Iran war without justification or a coherent strategy — this is the same sloppiness and disrespect we’ve seen since Day 1.
One year ago, I demanded CIA Director Ratcliffe answer for the Trump cabinet’s reckless discussion of classified information on Signal.
Nothing has changed: this Administration’s incompetence continues to put Americans at risk.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History885 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
885 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 18 / 18