The next generation deserves a President who understands the stakes of climate change and the benefits of embracing a clean energy economy - and puts their future first. (2/2)
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Colorado
Michael F. Bennet
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 826
Yes28%
No65%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align96%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Michael F. Bennet
U.S. SenatorDemocratColorado
SoupScore
Michael F.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 64 sponsored · 229 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
At President Trump’s inauguration, he declared an “energy emergency” to try and justify his damaging actions to roll back clean energy and climate protections.
It’s dangerous, and it weakens America’s energy leadership and progress towards a net-zero future. (1/2)
Western Colorado communities need help recovering after the historic flooding and wildfires this year, and federal assistance should be available to every state and county that needs it.
Together with Gov. Polis and the Colorado delegation, I will take every available step to appeal this decision.
FEMA’s denial of Colorado’s request for federal disaster assistance is unacceptable.
On its 6th birthday, the U.S. Space Force continues to be essential for ensuring U.S. national security by securing space superiority.
We in Colorado are proud to host four Space Force installations and the brave men and women who support its vital mission.
Jefferson County: If you have questions or need assistance related to ongoing power outages, please call the county hotline.
303-271-8911
Coloradans know firsthand how devastating worsening wildfires and other disasters are for their communities and insurance costs.
We must help families prepare, not just recover.
That’s why I’m pushing my tax credit to cover the costs of safeguarding homes & businesses before these disasters occur.
President Trump thinks he can intimidate Colorado by shuttering NCAR.
It’s political retribution, Senator John Hickenlooper and I won’t stand for it. We are holding up the appropriations package to demand NCAR is fully funded.
Read our full statement here:
The Trump Admin’s profiling, harassment, and arrest of Tribal citizens by ICE is unconscionable and a betrayal of the government’s responsibility to Tribal Nations that have existed here since time immemorial.
I’m pushing back on the DHS and calling for accountability for these inhumane practices.
Thank you to the brave firefighters and first responders working to protect Yuma County communities from growing wildfires in the area.
I am closely monitoring the situation as extreme winds threaten to spread the fires and put more homes and farmland at risk.
We cannot allow this administration to auction off our children’s and grandchildren’s inheritance. This effort to sell our national parks must be blocked.
[2/2]
After Senator Lee tried to sell off our public lands earlier this year, I fought it and helped stop his disastrous attempt.
Now he's targeting our national parks.
[1/2]
We cannot allow this administration to auction off our children’s and grandchildren’s inheritance. This effort to sell our national parks must be blocked.
[2/2]
His tariffs have pushed up the price of cars, clothes, home goods, and groceries. He gave tax breaks to his wealthy friends, cut benefits for working families, added $3T to the national debt, and unemployment is at a 4 year high.
This is not what Colordans want or deserve.
Donald Trump wants you to believe life is more affordable under his administration — but it’s not true.
This retribution puts lives and livelihoods at risk, and I will use every tool to fight back.
[2/2]
Donald Trump's vengeful plan to dismantle NCAR and cut millions in federal grants is the latest attack against Colorado.
I will not stand by while Trump weaponizes the federal government to punish our state.
[1/2]
But, I could not in good conscience vote to enable President Trump’s national security agenda and lawless Pentagon.
For that reason, I voted NO on the NDAA for the first time in my career.
The annual defense bill, the NDAA, contains important measures I fought for to support our servicemembers, Colorado, and our national security.
The President must not send our men and women in uniform into harm’s way for oil. The American people do not want yet another unauthorized, costly war based on an ill-conceived rationale.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History826 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
826 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17