His obsession with conspiracy theories and false claims — which he has forced his nominees to repeat in confirmation hearings — is only being used to justify one thing: the SAVE America Act, a bill so unpopular his own party refuses to pass it.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Colorado
Michael F. Bennet
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 885
Yes27%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting9%
Party align96%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Michael F. Bennet
U.S. SenatorDemocratColorado
SoupScore
Michael F.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 77 sponsored · 268 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Donald Trump’s speech tonight did nothing to safeguard our elections or strengthen our democracy.
The head of our intelligence community must be someone who will withstand inappropriate political influence. And the First Amendment should never be treated as a loophole. It’s the foundation of our Constitution and democracy.
This week, I questioned DNI nominee Jay Clayton on whether the White House directed his office to subpoena New York Times reporters after the publication of a story that allegedly upset President Trump.
Weatherization upgrades save families hundreds of dollars on utilities each year by dramatically improving the energy efficiency of their homes.
After joining my colleagues to demand Trump's Department of Energy release Weatherization Assistance funding, Colorado is finally getting the $5.8 million it's owed to help lower utilities costs for the people who need it most.
Our health care system fails Coloradans every day, leaving too many with high costs and fewer choices.
My Medicare-X bill will achieve universal coverage in our country.
Thanks to @repangiecraig.bsky.social for championing this fight in the House!
Congress must pass the GORP Act to make sure our kids and grandkids get to experience this incredible landscape as we do now.
For the first time – after more than a decade of grassroots work with seven bipartisan counties, Tribes, and a wide range of public lands users – the Senate's Energy and Natural Resources Committee is taking up our GORP Act.
The Gunnison Basin's public lands are home to a legacy of ranching, critical wildlife habitat, and some of the best outdoor recreation Colorado has to offer.
We cannot stand for it. DHS and ICE must be overhauled. I'll keep fighting to make sure our immigration enforcement reflects our values and respects the dignity of every person.
At least ten people have died at the hands of ICE during enforcement actions since the start of President Trump's second term. Instead of changing course to save lives, the administration doubled down on their cruel, inhumane policies.
Congress must pass our bipartisan bill as soon as possible to hold buyers of Russian oil accountable for bankrolling Putin's war and increase pressure on him to end it.
Backing Ukraine today is the best way to deter authoritarian aggression tomorrow — and secure a future where Europe is whole, free, and at peace.
This cannot be business as usual. That's why I joined my Senate Democratic colleagues today in voting against the first procedural vote on the annual defense bill.
I will do everything I can to fight President Trump's reckless war with Iran.
Congress passed a War Powers Resolution to end it. But the President is ignoring that vote, forcing American taxpayers to foot the bill for his blunder.
This is another broken promise to the Tribes who have lived in this region since time immemorial and to the next generation of Americans, who are relying on us to protect these irreplaceable landscapes. I will fight this every step of the way.
Once again, the President has disregarded the wishes of Tribal coalitions, western leaders, and the American people by removing protections for ancestral lands and cultural sites at Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears National Monuments.
A federal judge just called out Trump's "settlement" for what it really was: a shameless attempt to rubber stamp his $1.8 billion slush fund and grant his family audit immunity for past tax returns.
This is blatant corruption, and the courts are seeing right through it.
My thoughts are with the firefighters, law enforcement, and emergency responders still on the frontlines, risking their lives to keep us safe.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History885 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
885 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 18 / 18