The only opportunity I have to participate in this process is how I choose to vote, & I cannot support a measure that would devastate our state.
Congress should pass a short-term clean CR & then negotiate a bipartisan, long-term spending bill that gives our communities what they really need. 3
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Connecticut
Richard Blumenthal
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 789
Yes27%
No72%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Richard Blumenthal
U.S. SenatorDemocratConnecticut
SoupScore
Richard's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 104 sponsored · 574 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
It cedes unwarranted, broad, unbridled discretion to President Trump, creating in effect a personal slush fund. Republicans decided to barrel forward with this reprehensible & reckless bill without making any effort at bipartisan legislating. 2/
I will vote “no” on the Republican funding measure.
The Republican House bill slashes billions from community budgets for police officers, firefighters, & teachers & critical federal investments in the NIH’s cancer & Alzheimer’s research. 1/
We're witnessing a digital book burning—deleting data to manipulate the facts.
Straight out of authoritarian leaders’ playbook Musk & Trump are culling troves of public info collected with taxpayer dollars so they can create their own false reality.
A promising reason for hope—the ceasefire agreement puts the onus on Russia. U.S. military & intelligence support for Ukraine must be amplified, both in word & action ASAP—to preserve American credibility & enable Ukrainian perseverance.
Congressional Republicans are cowardly in their complicity. This move will hurt the students, teachers, & schools in their states & districts just as much.
But those it hurts the most will be kids with disabilities, low-income students, teachers already struggling in overcrowded classrooms, & so many more who will be left behind.
This appalling move will hurt kids & teachers everywhere—in red & blue states, in urban & rural communities, in kindergarten classrooms & on college campuses. abcnews.go.com/amp/US/depar...
Disbanding two key food safety advisory bodies—supposedly for savings—serves only food companies that carelessly cause contamination. Recent outbreaks like Boar’s Head listeria show how stricter oversight, not weaker, is urgent & necessary.
That’s why I am introducing comprehensive legislation to ensure our government reverses course & puts veterans first—not tax cuts for billionaires. Vets & their families have willingly sacrificed for this country, & they deserve a gov't that treats them with dignity & respect. 4
These reckless actions are damaging the economic security & morale of our military & veteran families, the federal government’s ability to recruit and retain high-quality talent, & our national security. 3/
They are slashing & trashing the VA with their plans to further cut more than 80,000 VA employees & tens of thousands of veterans. The real life impacts of Trump & Musk’s harmful policies on our nation’s military & veteran community are undeniable and growing. 2/
My Putting Veterans First Act is a call to action at a moment of crisis for vets. VA health care & benefits has been disastrously put on the chopping block by Musk & Trump. Their cuts, freezes, firings, & other malign directives will destroy lives & livelihoods if unchecked. 1/
CT electricity consumers will feel the pain—as skyrocketing energy prices resulting from Trump tariffs hit hard. Tariffs on Canadian oil, gas & electricity will spur inflation. I’m telling Trump to halt energy tariffs & FERC to refuse compelling collection.
No, to funding research that helps find a cure for cancer.
No, to supporting the Veterans Crisis Line.
Yes, to funneling taxpayer dollars into a cryptocurrency stockpile that only benefits Trump’s tech cronies. www.bbc.com/news/article...
To the educators, scientists, activists, union members, who joined the Stand Up for Science rally: thank you for speaking out. Trump & Musk are slashing & trashing agencies & funding supporting critical research & fueling scientific innovation. We must fight these disastrous cuts.
It’s intentional malevolence or malign neglect. Either way, this attack on our brave veterans must stop.
Factual & hard hitting, this account of chaos & confusion at the VA confirms our urgent cries to stop the bleeding. Veterans are shortchanged & systematically betrayed by cruel cuts in staff & critical resources—resulting from Trump/Musk/Collins anti-vet policies.
Sounding a red alarm—our VA is in mortal peril. Vets health care & benefits—especially the PACT Act, & more—are on the chopping block as cruel, malevolent Musk cuts take effect. Now is the time to stand up & speak out. Apply pressure. Stop the bleeding.
Trump is playing with fire. Training saves heroes’ lives. Restore the classes.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History789 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
789 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-08 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-43) |
| 2025-05-08 | S.J. Res. 7 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-38) |
| 2025-05-07 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (55-45) |
| 2025-05-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-05-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-05-01 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (49-49) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (83-14) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-13) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (67-29) |
| 2025-04-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-27) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-26) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-25) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-37) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-04-07 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-39) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.