Finally Republicans must speak out & stand up before Putin exploits Trump’s weak, pathetic surrender. At the Munich Security Conference, bipartisan members of Congress heard anger & apprehension from our allies, & expressed our own support for Ukraine, face to face with Zelenskyy.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Connecticut
Richard Blumenthal
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 825
Yes28%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Richard Blumenthal
U.S. SenatorDemocratConnecticut
SoupScore
Richard's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 110 sponsored · 583 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Trump blaming Ukraine for Putin’s cruel, bloody assault on Ukraine is a betrayal—not only of brave freedom fighters there but of European allies & America. It gives moral cover to Putin pushing forward to swallow Ukraine—& then Poland, the Baltics, & others.
Now that this darkness has ended for Sagui & his family, he can finally meet his new daughter. May Sagui’s courage & his heartening release uplift the path to peace & embolden the work ahead to ensure all hostages can return home.
I’m overjoyed for Sagui Dekel-Chen & his loved ones who will finally be reunited after Sagui’s many horrific months in Hamas’s captivity. Throughout this painful time, I’ve spoken with Sagui’s father, Jonathan, a CT native whose strength has been an inspiration.
If there are negotiations, they must be from a position of strength, with our backing Ukraine unequivocally with arms & funds. Putin will weaponize on the battlefield & the negotiating table.
Ukraine’s brave fight for freedom is our fight too—& Europe’s. Our security is inextricably bound as Zelenskyy boldly articulates, because Putin will target other countries if he wins in Ukraine. Munich is a city whose name stands for the tragic futility of appeasing aggression.
Proud to stand with Ukraine—strongly & clearly—as President Zelenskyy movingly speaks to our bipartisan delegation at the Munich Security Conference. He is resolute & powerful—Ukraine has the will to win against Russia’s bloody assault. It needs our support.
The leader of the FBI should prioritize building a smart, independent agency to fight crime & keep America safe, not culling nonpartisan law enforcement officers to create a sycophantic goon squad ready to crush political opposition.
In response to my questions, Patel claimed he “didn’t recall” being aware of FBI purges, but as whistleblowers come forward this seems less & less like the truth. Under this new light, his responses seem misleading (at best) or perjurious (at worst).
Kash Patel is reportedly covertly directing the firing of career agents at the FBI. Patel seems to be the puppet master removing experienced agents & undercutting the FBI’s ability to identify threats & keep Americans out of harm’s way.
As pathbreaking leaders in cancer research, biotech, AI, brain science, & more, CT labs & facilities will be hard hit by Trump’s fund cuts. Nationwide as well as CT, he & Musk put life saving research at risk. I’ll fight their slash & trash plans.
It’s simple—this Administration wants to reward the rich while beating down the working class. They don’t care what happens to hard-working Americans as long as they get their money & keep the wealthy happy.
The CFPB has returned over $21 billion to consumers—putting money back in the hands of working Americans rather than lining the pockets of bank executives. It’s not surprising Wall St & financial giants jumped at the first opportunity to obliterate the agency that holds them accountable.
Trump & Musk shut down the CFPB so the President’s rich pals & corporate oligarchs can cheat & scam Americans out of their hard-earned money. No questions, no accountability, just rolling in the dough.
Despite snow, the Annual Run for Refugees in New Haven sponsored by IRIS drew a huge, spirited crowd—spectators & 5K runners. IRIS does such monumentally important work in helping settlement of immigrants & refugees—more urgently needed than ever before.
It is imperative Congress promptly obtain information on Musk’s power grab, including the extent to which Musk is gathering information about his companies’ competitors & whether his companies' employees are working on behalf of DOGE. That's why PSI is opening an inquiry.
As Ranking Member on PSI, I’m demanding answers from Musk’s companies on his conflicts of interest & unprecedented data heist. Musk shouldn't be able to use sensitive gov’t data to benefit his businesses, endanger Americans’ private info, & consolidate power.
Trump is going to gut your kid’s education.
If he has his way you’ll be saying goodbye to public education while families who can shell out the dough for private institutions get access to quality schools.
Patel is asking for one of the most consequential jobs in law enforcement, leading a Bureau under direct attack from the person who nominated him.
We can't move forward with this nomination without a second hearing—& I'm demanding Chairman Grassley schedule one immediately. 4
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History825 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
825 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-39) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | S. 331 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (78-19) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-32) |
| 2025-03-06 | S. 331 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-30) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-03-05 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-47) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-27) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-03 | S. 9 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 12 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 10 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (47-52) |
| 2025-02-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (54-44) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-28) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (24-76) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.