Suzanne Bonamici headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Oregon District 1
Born
October 14, 1954
Age 71
Phone
(202) 225-0855
Office
2231 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Oregon District 1

Suzanne Bonamici

Suzanne Marie Bonamici is an American lawyer and politician serving as the U.S. representative for Oregon's 1st congressional district, a seat she was first elected to in a 2012 special election. The district includes most of Portland west of the Willamette River, along with most of Portland's western suburbs such as Beaverton, Hillsboro, Tigard, and Lake Oswego.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 553
Yes39%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Suzanne Bonamici headshot
Suzanne Bonamici
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOregon District 1
SoupScore
Suzanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 56 sponsored · 268 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

The tax credits and rebates in the climate bill help make EVs more affordable for Americans and create jobs and investments across the country. Elon Musk wants to kill these EV benefits, which would hurt Tesla’s competition but help Elon. www.forbes.com/sites/sarado...
The Social Security Fairness Act, a bipartisan bill that extends Social Security coverage to close to 3 million workers, passed, as well as my retiring colleague Rep. Jennifer Wexton’s bill to invest in pediatric research.
Although the funding bill we passed to prevent a government shutdown lacked many provisions I supported, like the Older Americans Act and the Workforce Innovation Opportunity Act, a few important bills passed separately.
The government funding bill that the House passed is not perfect, but it is free of the partisan provisions that the House GOP inserted into the previous bill at the demand of Donald Trump and unelected multibillionaire Elon Musk. (2/3)
The House GOP then brought up a new partisan government funding proposal with less than an hour to review, and that bill failed on the House floor. Speaker Johnson should prevent a government shutdown by bringing the bipartisan, bicameral compromise bill to the floor today.
Leaders on both sides of the aisle in the House and Senate negotiated a bipartisan bill to keep the government open. It’s a compromise bill; nobody got everything they wanted. 🧵
The House GOP’s new government funding proposal is a bad deal for everyday Americans. It strips out funding for childhood cancer research and other positive provisions that were in the bicameral, bipartisan compromise bill. I voted no.
Elon Musk and Donald Trump are threatening to tank the $624 million in disaster relief funds for Oregonians that’s included in the bipartisan, bicameral deal to keep the government open.
Oregon experienced one of the most destructive wildfire seasons this year, with a record-setting 2 million acres burned.
Oregon could lose out on $624 million in disaster relief money without a stopgap spending bill that’s been rejected by Republican members of Congress as well as President-elect Donald Trump, House Democrats said Thursday. oregoncapitalchronicle.com/2024/12/19/d... by @jennifershutt.bsky.social
Elon Musk and Donald Trump are telling the House GOP to kill a bipartisan, bicameral negotiated funding deal that would keep the government open. I spoke with KOIN News about what a government shutdown would mean for Oregonians.
Congresswoman Bonamici answers questions during an interview at the U.S. Capitol.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
553 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 12