We remember the more than 58,000 heroes who gave their lives in service to our country, including 106 brave servicemembers from Ventura County.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 26
Julia Brownley
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 583
Yes41%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting4%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 26
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Julia Brownley
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 26
SoupScore
Julia's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 54 sponsored · 272 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
On National Vietnam War Veterans Day, we honor the courage and sacrifice of the men and women who served in uniform during one of our nation’s most difficult chapters.
Reposted byCongresswoman Julia Brownley
On today’s Democratic Daily Download, @meeks.house.gov explains why the Signal chat was a threat to our national security, why Hegseth must resign and how Dems are forcing a vote to compel the Trump Administration into releasing all details surrounding the disclosure of classified info.
Reposted byCongresswoman Julia Brownley
On today’s Democratic Daily Download, @adamsmith.house.gov, Ranking Member of the @democrats-armedservices.house.gov Committee, raises the alarm about threat the Trump Administration poses to U.S. national security.
This isn’t just a budget cut – it’s a direct attack on public health that will put lives at risk.
But that’s not all. Now, they want to gut 20,000 jobs at the Department of Health & Human Services—not political appointees, but doctors, scientists, and experts who:
✅ Protect our food
✅ Monitor deadly diseases
✅ Approve life-saving medications
✅ Oversee health insurance for nearly half the country
The Trump Administration recklessly slashed over $12 billion from public health programs that track infectious diseases, expand mental health care, and provide addiction treatment.
Hegseth’s arrogance and blatant disregard for basic security is astounding. Hegseth must resign immediately.
And instead of owning up to their incompetence, Trump senior officials continue to downplay the risks, dismissing the dangers, and making excuses to cover for their own failures. It is only by the grace of God that no American lives were lost due to this incompetence.
This wasn’t just reckless – it was an egregious security failure that put our nation security and American servicemembers in grave danger.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth claimed, “nobody was texting war plans.” Yet, 31 minutes before U.S. military jets launched to strike Houthi targets, Hegseth was sending classified launch times in an unsecured, commercial messaging app.
Reposted byCongresswoman Julia Brownley
On today’s Democratic Daily Download, Rep. Jim Himes, top Dem on the House Intel Committee, breaks down the Signal chat controversy, why it’s so serious, and what Dems are doing about it.
Reposted byCongresswoman Julia Brownley
@reptedlieu.bsky.social on today’s Democratic Daily Download.
Texting top secret war plans is a serious breach of national security protocol. We’re calling on Republicans to join Democrats in opening investigations to get to the bottom of this misconduct.
On #EqualPayDay, we remind the world: Women deserve equal pay for equal work. It’s time to close the pay gap and pass the Paycheck Fairness Act to ensure fair pay for all.
For the first time in 20 years, the gender wage gap has widened. Women are now paid just 75 cents for every dollar that men make. Over a course of a 40-year career, that adds up to more than $573,000 in lost wages.
Yet, Republicans in the House and Senate remain silent and refuse to hold this administration accountable through any kind of oversight. Their inaction is not just shameful, it’s a dereliction of duty.
Their reckless mishandling of classified information and blatant security failures endanger our servicemembers and put our national security at risk.
The sheer incompetence of Pete Hegseth and Trump’s senior officials isn’t just outrageous, it’s outright dangerous.
www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...
Supporting the men and women who have served our nation must transcend partisan ideology because supporting veterans is always the right thing to do. We must do everything in our power to serve them as well as they have served us.
These firings are a clear indication that this administration is not prioritizing the needs of the men and women who have bravely served our nation in uniform and is actively undermining the quality of care they receive.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History583 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
583 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2312 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2270 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6504 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 2683 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-09 | H.R. 5184 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 1834 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 131 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 504 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.