Trump and House Republicans want to gut food assistance programs like SNAP in their Big Ugly Bill. @housedemocrats.bsky.social believe that Americans should have access to healthy food and shouldn’t have to go hungry so we’ll fight like hell against cuts to SNAP.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 44
Nanette Diaz Barragán
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 569
Yes41%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 44
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Nanette Diaz Barragán
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 44
SoupScore
Nanette Diaz's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 26 sponsored · 240 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
SNAP benefits help ensure people don’t go hungry.
And programs like Market Match give SNAP beneficiaries $30 worth of produce at farmers markets for just $15 of SNAP dollars. This match doubles the food assistance value and provides access to fresh fruits and vegetables.
Republicans don’t give a damn about the health of women in America. Their Big Ugly Bill cuts access to affordable reproductive health care.
This bill is just a Big Ugly excuse to control Americans’ right to make decisions about their own bodies and health.
Trump & Republicans in Congress want to gut SNAP in their Big Ugly Bill — they’re fine with tens of millions of Americans going hungry because their only priority is their billionaire buddies buying a new yacht or private jet with even more tax breaks.
Reposted byCongresswoman Nanette Barragán
At recent town hall meetings, @repbonamici.bsky.social heard from Oregonians loud and clear: they're outraged by GOP's Medicaid cuts.
On today's Democratic Daily Download, she shares how Democrats are doing everything we can to fight these irresponsible and immoral Medicaid cuts.
In just a few short days, House Republicans need to decide if they will do the right thing and vote against Trump’s Big Ugly Bill — or screw millions of Americans over by ripping away their health care, food assistance, and other essential programs.
Stopped by the Long Beach Red Shield this weekend to welcome children from across LA and Orange County to a FREE, one-day sports academy in #CA44.
Thank you AKP Sports Foundation for bringing this opportunity to #LongBeach.
Proud to join our #SanPedro neighbors for a rally today on the LA waterfront to send a clear message:
Our port community will continue to show up, stand up, and speak out against the chaos, cruelty, and pain caused by Trump’s Big Ugly Bill & the Republicans who refuse to stand up for what is right.
The latest Senate reconciliation text is the Ugliest bill yet.
It will throw millions off Medicaid, shutter hospitals, kick millions off food assistance, and hike energy costs by hundreds of dollars.
If Republicans move forward with this monstrosity, Americans will suffer.
x.com/centeronbudg...
Rep. @lofgren.house.gov & I are leading a resolution to condemn this wrongful deployment, reaffirm support for state and local law enforcement in their handling of protests and bad actors, and support the people’s First Amendment right to peacefully protest the dangerous actions of the Trump Admin.
Americans have the First Amendment right to peacefully protest when Trump and Stephen Miller terrorize their communities with indiscriminate ICE raids — without Trump deploying the National Guard and active-duty Marines to stop them.
Reposted byCongresswoman Nanette Barragán
@chuygarcia.house.gov explains how Trump’s Big, Ugly Bill strips 16 million people of their health care, guts essential nutrition programs and pours billions into Trump’s mass deportation machine. Democrats are fighting to protect working families, uphold due process and stop this harmful bill.
The 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to anyone born in the United States, and @HouseDemocrats.bsky.social will not stop in our efforts to protect that right.
#SCOTUS just ruled that federal district courts can no longer block executive actions across the country. But the fight is still on against Trump’s plan to end birthright citizenship.
www.npr.org/2025/06/27/n...
That’s why I worked with Rep. @lofgren.house.gov, to introduce a resolution that condemns violence, supports peaceful protest, and sets the facts straight. Angelenos have exercised their First Amendment right to peacefully protest federal ICE raids that have terrorized our communities.
My Republican colleague’s resolution distorts the facts of what really happened in LA. It paints a false picture of widespread chaos across LA in an effort to justify and legitimize Donald Trump’s dangerous decision to deploy the National Guard and U.S. Marines.
@housedemocrats.bsky.social will continue to hold the Trump EPA accountable to protect Americans’ right to clean air and water.
Don’t let Republicans pretend that the toxic waste of coal ash is a gift to our communities. It contaminates our ground water and the latest science shows it causes cancer and heart disease at much higher rates than previously expected.
Reposted byCongresswoman Nanette Barragán
Three years after SCOTUS rolled back abortion rights, young women today have fewer rights than their mothers and grandmothers. @pressley.house.gov talks about Republican attacks on reproductive freedom and Trump’s One Big Ugly Bill exacerbating the devastating consequences of the Dobbs decision.
No, Americans will NOT get over losing their health care so Republicans’ billionaire buddies can get bigger yachts. @housedemocrats.bsky.social are united against this bill — we just need a few Republicans to do the right thing and join us.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History569 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
569 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 2721 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.