Reposted bySteve Cohen
When other nations broadcast news that the US has decided is contraband and won’t broadcast, you know you’re living in a third world authoritarian country.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Tennessee District 9
Steve Cohen
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 594
Yes40%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting6%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 9
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Steve Cohen
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratTennessee District 9
SoupScore
Steve's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 57 sponsored · 332 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Those are all true and stronger than felon, but felon did cover them
Black is the perfect Christmas color for them. Bah humbug!
www.facebook.com/share/p/1EyR...
Worst KENNEDY CENTER HONORS ratings.Not a surprise as the host is considered a misfit, a felon,a narcissist,a grifter (and that was before he started his theft of the Kennedy legacy)and cultural nerd.The honorees were chosen because 47 liked them,not a large field.
I voted for the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and it became law 30 days ago.
What this Administration has produced so far is wildly incomplete. They are slow-walking disclosure and shielding key facts about Epstein’s operation.
The law is not optional, and defying it will have consequences.
Reposted bySteve Cohen
A Memorial to Kennedy? It’s Trump’s Now, Too. www.nytimes.com/2025/12/19/u... only a tone deaf, morally challenged egotist would have this done
I recall John F Kennedy and you Donald are no John F Kennedy.
With attribution to Lloyd Bentsen
All well done, smothered in catsup, and priced at $100 but free if you bring a minor female along
Reposted bySteve Cohen
The above photo was taken by me when I was 11 years old and President Kennedy was in Memphis and on the way to a speech on the bluff during the 1960 campaign
Reposted bySteve Cohen
Trump‘s named Kennedy Center board voted today to rename the Kennedy Center, “Trump Kennedy Center.”This is a sacrilege to the memory of a martyred and heroic assassinated president of the United States. The center was named in his honor and should stay that way.
PT 109 and bone spurs don’t match.
Reposted bySteve Cohen
Letter to editor Wash Post.
He lies far more than he speaks truth ( if ever)
Beelzebub
A Memorial to Kennedy? It’s Trump’s Now, Too. www.nytimes.com/2025/12/19/u... only a tone deaf, morally challenged egotist would have this done
I recall John F Kennedy and you Donald are no John F Kennedy.
With attribution to Lloyd Bentsen
Letter to editor Wash Post.
He lies far more than he speaks truth ( if ever)
Reposted bySteve Cohen
Renaming the Kennedy Center for Trump would be a sacrilege.
JFK was a martyred, historic US president whose name is synonymous with artistic excellence in America. The idea that Trump would put his name BEFORE Kennedy’s—or even alongside it—is obscene. The Kennedy Center should never be renamed.
Trump Administration Live Updates: Kennedy Center Adds Trump’s Name to Facade www.nytimes.com/live/2025/12...
NOT A SCINTILLA OF CLASS DOES Trump have!🤮
Renaming the Kennedy Center for Trump would be a sacrilege.
JFK was a martyred, historic US president whose name is synonymous with artistic excellence in America. The idea that Trump would put his name BEFORE Kennedy’s—or even alongside it—is obscene. The Kennedy Center should never be renamed.
I believe it does require legislation as it was named by Congress
Maniacal egotism prompting fawning acolytes to kiss the faux Kings a…
The above photo was taken by me when I was 11 years old and President Kennedy was in Memphis and on the way to a speech on the bluff during the 1960 campaign
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History594 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
594 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 1717 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.