Joaquin Castro headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Texas District 20
Born
September 16, 1974
Age 51
Phone
(202) 225-3236
Office
2241 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Texas District 20

Joaquin Castro

Joaquin Castro is an American lawyer and Democratic politician who has represented Texas's 20th congressional district in the United States House of Representatives since 2013. The district includes just over half of his native San Antonio. He currently serves on the United States House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 518
Yes38%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting4%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 20

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Joaquin Castro headshot
Joaquin Castro
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratTexas District 20
SoupScore
Joaquin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 21 sponsored · 101 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

The Administration is working to dismantle agencies, like USAID and the Millennium Challenge Corporation, that were established by law. These actions do not make us safer, stronger, or more prosperous.
The Trump Administration illegally deported, against his mother’s will, a 4-year-old U.S. citizen with Stage four cancer. Tell me – what crime did this child commit? The rights of every American are endangered by this kind of lawless action by our government.
Thank you to @maldef.bsky.social for awarding me the Excellence in Government Service Award last week. From standing up for constituent rights, to community outreach and successful litigation, MALDEF has remained a pillar in our community.
Donald Trump has worked relentlessly to dismantle the infrastructure of opportunity in America and used the most unqualified cabinet in our nation's history to do so. The last 100 days prove it.
Every government official who serves our country makes a commitment to uphold the rule of law. These actions are unconstitutional, and each day they go unchecked is another day our democracy and our rights are assaulted.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia and others are rotting in the bowels of these barbaric prisons despite court orders – from the Supreme Court down – that have instructed the return of these individuals.
Today, I introduced a Resolution of Inquiry (ROI) to direct the Trump Administration to provide Congress with all records relating to the removal of individuals in the United States to El Salvador.
Every government official who serves our country makes a commitment to uphold the rule of law. These actions are unconstitutional, and each day they go unchecked is another day our democracy and our rights are assaulted.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia and others are rotting in the bowels of these barbaric prisons despite court orders – from the Supreme Court down – that have instructed the return of these individuals.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
518 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-15H.R. 3400 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-15H.J. Res. 117 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3486 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3944 (119th)Instruct negotiatorsYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3425 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3424 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 539 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 747 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 4216 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 11Next →