Jasmine Crockett headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Texas District 30
Born
March 29, 1981
Age 45
Phone
(202) 225-8885
Office
1616 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Texas District 30

Jasmine Crockett

Jasmine Felicia Crockett is an American lawyer and politician serving as the U.S. representative for Texas's 30th congressional district since 2023. A member of the Democratic Party, she represented the 100th district in the Texas House of Representatives from 2021 to 2023.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 568
Yes39%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 30

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jasmine Crockett headshot
Jasmine Crockett
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratTexas District 30
SoupScore
Jasmine's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 19 sponsored · 139 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

On today’s episode of “He’s Tearing This S**t Up”—Trump plans to dismantle NOAA, shutting down climate research and weather labs.​ In Texas, that means fewer hurricane warnings, less drought data, & more risk to our communities.​ This isn’t just a budget cut—it’s a threat to our safety.
The Trump administration plans to eliminate the research arm of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, close all weather and climate labs and eviscerate its budget along with several other NOAA offices, according to internal documents obtained by CNN.
This reckless “plan” would: — Rip food off the tables of 115,000 TX-30 residents on SNAP — Take free lunch from 97,497 kids in our schools They love calling it a budget. But let’s call it what it really is: an attack on working families. (4/4)
123,930 people on Medicaid — or STAR+PLUS here in Texas — could lose their health care altogether. We’re talking about seniors, people with disabilities, and low-income families who actually need this coverage. (3/4)
Today, we’re voting on what Republicans are calling the “SAVE Act”—but let’s be real, it’s a straight-up voter suppression bill. They are literally trying to make it harder for millions of Americans to exercise their right to vote. I’m voting NO—hell no, actually.
Now they see it. Trump isn’t fixing the system—he’s breaking it. So many Americans are saying ‘enough is enough,’ and my Democratic colleagues and I are united in not only pushing back, but putting forth people-centered policy that actually makes a difference.
Republicans pulled their budget vote—surprise! They’re too busy fighting each other to govern. They might be split on the math, but they agree on this: cutting services for working families & rewarding billionaires. This ain’t a budget—it’s a blueprint to rob the people.
Republicans think slashing and tearing things apart is the solution to everything—especially immigration. But mass deportation isn’t a plan. It’s dangerous—and it leads to innocent U.S. citizens being deported. Just another example of them having no real plan—only concepts of one.
As a criminal defense attorney, the vast majority of my cases were NOT immigrants. So let's stop pretending immigrants are the problem when there's a 34-count convicted felon sitting in the White House. The hypocrisy is outrageous.
The House Judiciary Committee is wasting time on a hearing called ‘Sanctuary Jurisdictions: Magnet for Migrants, Cover for Criminals.’ I’ll be there to set the record straight: it’s Trump’s reckless immigration policies that are endangering our communities—not sanctuary cities.
DOGE Oversight Subcommittee held a hearing on reducing federal property. All they said was “fire sale” this, “fire sale” that. Meanwhile, they’re lighting all of this s**t on fire — while their incompetent leader wastes millions of taxpayer dollars golfing, all while steering us towards a recession.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
568 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-01-21H.R. 186 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsYESYESFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 12