Donald Trump has enough money to:
- Renovate his $400M Qatari jet
- Give Amazon a $7.8 billion tax break
- Send Kash Patel to party at the Olympics
But YOUR refund on his illegal tariffs?
Trump says eat dirt.

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Ohio District 8
Warren Davidson
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 498
Yes75%
No22%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align91%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 8
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Warren Davidson
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanOhio District 8
SoupScore
Warren's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 57 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Democrats dropped a bill TODAY to stop private equity's housing takeover. Let's get this done.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
Warren: "Warsh has been a high interest guy in good times & bad. It has been his one constant - until he wanted the job of fed chair. And then he said, 'I will say whatever Trump wants, bc that's the test for the job.' I don't think having a sock puppet as head of the Fed preserves Fed independence"
Our bill:
1) Ends Wall Street tax breaks for buying up homes
2) Reinvests the savings to build more housing and lower costs
3) Empowers antitrust enforcers to prevent corporate housing monopolies
4) Promotes new housing supply and incentivizes sales to real people.
Wall Street firms own millions of homes and are the biggest landlords of mobile homes. Corporate landlords bought 1 in 6 homes last year while first-time homebuyers bottomed out. Investors own up to 25% of metros like Atlanta, Jacksonville, and Charlotte.
We need to act now.
President Trump says he wants to stop Wall Street and private equity from buying up homes.
Democrats are introducing The American Homeownership Act to get it done - while boosting housing supply and lowering costs.
The President and Republicans should join us.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
Working families are drowning in credit card debt—paying 25-30% interest while big banks post record profits.
Trump promised a 10% credit card interest cap but has failed to follow through.
Another promise broken.
Donald Trump and his Education Secretary are hellbent on illegally abolishing the Education Department and making our public education system worse.
Students and families deserve better.
We need a full investigation into this administration's attempts to sabotage our schools.
Scott Bessent thinks it's his job to please Donald Trump.
He needs to get to work and give the people of the United States their money back.
Remember Donald Trump's promise to "drain the swamp"?
Well, it looks like he's embraced the swamp instead.
There are now former lobbyists in senior roles all over his administration who could be helping their former clients.
I'm calling for an investigation.
Six weeks ago, Donald Trump called me. He said he wanted to cap credit card interest rates.
There's still no relief for the American people.
Ahead of Trump’s State of the Union address, I wrote about his broken promises on credit card affordability.
Big Oil flooded Donald Trump’s campaign with cash.
Now, they’re getting billions in handouts from his administration.
Not enough people are talking about this:
Donald Trump is suing his OWN administration for $10 BILLION in taxpayer dollars.
When someone illegally takes your money, that’s called stealing.
Donald Trump stole your money with his illegal tariffs — and you paid higher prices on everything from housing to groceries.
It’s time for Trump to pay up and give back your money.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said consumers, not big corporations, should get refunds.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History498 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
498 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | NO | ✕ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | NO | ✕ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | NO | ✕ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | NO | ✕ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | NO | ✕ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | NO | ✕ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | NO | ✕ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.