We're back in DC to vote on pressing Republican priorities: eliminating caps on overdraft fees, rigging the judiciary system in their favor, and disenfranchising millions of women from voting.
I'm sure Americans appreciate the GOP making life more expensive and difficult!

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Texas District 16
Veronica Escobar
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 536
Yes40%
No58%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 16
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Veronica Escobar
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratTexas District 16
SoupScore
Veronica's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 13 sponsored · 60 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Unions gave us the 40-hour workweek, labor protections, basic benefits, safer workplaces, and the leverage working Americans needed.
Threatening unions threatens millions of workers across the country – all to protect billionaires and big corporations’ profits.
Despite ongoing measles outbreaks, the Trump administration is slashing budgets and staffing for the very agency that protects communities from deadly diseases.
Trump is making Americans sicker and poorer to give tax breaks to billionaires.
www.nytimes.com/2025/03/26/h...
The bipartisan American Families United Act is a critical step in the right direction. I look to working with my colleagues to advance this crucial legislation.
These provisions prevent undocumented spouses of Americans from getting any legal protections whatsoever.
Americans recognize that it is in our country’s best interests to restore legal pathways for immigrants and keep families together.
Yesterday, I reintroduced the American Families United Act.
There are hundreds of thousands of American families who have been forced to live apart or relocate to another country because of draconian provisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act.
escobar.house.gov/news/documen...
Hegseth repeatedly lied to the American people and should be fired - along with all the others in the chat. These are strike plans.
There must be a broad investigation of how compromised our national security is because of their shocking incompetence.
www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...
“The president knew. He was just trolling.”
Trolling? More like not taking accountability- just like his SecDef who tried to dodge and deflect when asked about this. He should never have been confirmed and should be fired immediately.
“The people in that group determine what's classified."
Nope. We were fortunate that an adversary didn’t gain access to the details, which would have put our warfighters in unnecessary and very grave danger. And it sends a message to allies that we can’t be trusted with their secrets.
“Who cares? This is Trump being transparent!"
Nope. This happened by accident. Anyone with a top secret security clearance knows they shouldn’t text specific plans to bomb another country over text. And btw the Signal chat was set to “disappear” - yet another violation!
There’s absolutely no excuse for the colossal incompetence displayed by Waltz, Hegseth, Vance, Gabbard, et al.
And the mental gymnastics involved in trying to explain this away is pretty astounding. Let’s discuss, shall we?
Perhaps only second to the dangerous incompetence and recklessness of the people on that chat. All of whom need to be held accountable for this egregious violation of the law.
If it’s true that the President of the United States had no idea that his war cabinet and VP were discussing war plans on a Signal chat that included a journalist, that is astounding ignorance and profound incompetence.
Another horrific shooting and yet another community reeling from the devastation of gun violence.
Las Cruces isn’t just our neighbor—we are one deeply connected community. My heart is with the victims, families, and all New Mexicans; El Paso will always stand with you.
I’m hosting one on March 29th!
More info here⬇️
www.eventbrite.com/e/march-29th...
Reposted byRep. Veronica Escobar
A new report from @budgetlab.bsky.social confirms the GOP budget steals from the middle class to give to the ultra-rich.
While billionaires get massive giveaways, costs go up for the bottom 40%.
Republicans are proving they work for their billionaire donors — not for working Americans
This administration is disappearing people to other countries without a shred of evidence or any ruling from a judge.
It’s authoritarianism on our soil.
Along with my Democratic colleagues on the Appropritations Committee, I'm urging Leader Schumer and Senate Democrats to stand with House Democrats and the American people, reject this continuing resolution, and force House and Senate Republicans back to the negotiating table.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History536 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
536 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 11 / 11