Ruben Gallego headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Arizona
Born
November 20, 1979
Age 46
Phone
(202) 224-4521
Office
302 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Arizona

Ruben Gallego

Rubén Marinelarena Gallego is an American politician and Marine Corps veteran serving since 2025 as the junior United States senator from Arizona. A member of the Democratic Party, he served from 2015 to 2025 as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Arizona and from 2011 to 2014 as a member of the Arizona House of Representatives.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 776
Yes33%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting13%
Party align91%
Cross-party9%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Ruben Gallego headshot
Ruben Gallego
U.S. SenatorDemocratArizona
SoupScore
Ruben's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 51 sponsored · 234 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

If you’ve flown on a plane, there’s a good chance your seatbelt was made right here in Arizona. I spent some time today touring the facility and talking with the workers who keep all of us safe in the air. They are the backbone of our economy, and I’m grateful for the work they do every day.
Le entregué el libro de una de las víctimas de Epstein a Mike Johnson. Si de verdad lo lee, tal vez por fin publicará los archivos de Epstein y dejará de proteger a los poderosos que la abusaron. Ya es hora de que se haga justicia para los cientos de víctimas, incluyendo las 15 víctimas Latinas.
I dropped off Virginia Giuffre’s memoir for Speaker Johnson. If he actually reads it, maybe he’ll finally release the Epstein Files and stop covering for the powerful men who abused her. Justice for Virginia and the hundreds of other victims is long overdue.
To every veteran who’s answered the call — thank you. Our country is stronger because of your courage and sacrifice. 
Today and every day, we honor you and your families for all you’ve given to this nation.
I’ve looked hardworking Arizona parents in the eyes and promised I’d fight to help them keep their health insurance. 
I sure as hell won’t give up that fight for a show vote.
I had a great time chatting with our DC interns this morning. They asked thoughtful questions about public service, leadership, and what it’s really like to work in Congress. I always leave these conversations inspired by their curiosity and commitment to making a difference.
You can feel it. Working class Latinos are frustrated. Prices keep rising, ICE raids are ramping up, and people who once stayed quiet are beginning to question how they are being treated. The data finally shows what we’ve been hearing in our communities.
There has to be a solution from Republicans, or at least assurances I can believe in. Because right now, 24 million Americans are at risk of seeing their healthcare costs double overnight. That’s not something I’m willing to gamble with.
For Día de Los Muertos, @padilla.senate.gov and I each left a photo of a loved one at the other office’s ofrenda. Proud to bring a beautiful tradition to the U.S. Senate to remember and honor those who have gone before us.
It’s absurd that AI companies are letting their chatbots run unchecked, exposing kids and teens to sexual abuse and encouraging self-harm. It must end now. I’m working across the aisle to pass the GUARD Act to hold Big Tech accountable and protect our kids.
You can now preview 2026 ACA insurance premiums on healthcare.gov. A family of four in Maricopa County paid $514 a month for their ACA plan in 2025. Next year, that same plan will cost $2,435. That kind of increase will be devastating for thousands of Arizona families.
I sat down with Steve, a husband and father of three from Gilbert, Arizona. He already pays $3,400 each month for health insurance through the ACA to make sure his family can get the care they need. Families like Steve’s shouldn’t have to face their health care costs rising even higher.
Congress created a contingency fund specifically to keep SNAP running during a shutdown. Trump knows that. He’s lying when he says we can’t keep it going. He’s using hunger as leverage.
With Republicans controlling all three branches, the ball’s in their court. I want a deal, but negotiations require them to show up. If they don’t, 24 million Americans will pay the price.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
776 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGNOAmendment Rejected (14-81)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Rejected (45-50)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Rejected (42-53)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Rejected (44-51)
2025-08-01Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-08-01End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-41)
2025-07-31End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-44)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (53-44)
2025-07-31End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (59-39)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-41)
2025-07-30End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (59-38)
2025-07-30S.J. Res. 34 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34NOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (24-73)
2025-07-30S.J. Res. 41 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41NOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (27-70)
2025-07-30End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-07-30End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-49)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-44)
2025-07-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-28End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-07-28Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (50-39)
2025-07-28End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-07-24End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-48)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-07-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-47)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-47)
2025-07-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (48-47)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-47)
2025-07-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-47)
2025-07-23H.R. 3944 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 7 / 16Next →