Ruben Gallego headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Arizona
Born
November 20, 1979
Age 46
Phone
(202) 224-4521
Office
302 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Arizona

Ruben Gallego

Voting Record — 899
Yes34%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting13%
Party align92%
Cross-party8%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Ruben Gallego headshot
Ruben Gallego
U.S. SenatorDemocratArizona
SoupScore
Ruben's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 61 sponsored · 274 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

The U.S.–Canada relationship is bigger than any one administration. I’m committed to ensuring the partnership between our two countries endures long after President Trump leaves office.
The best part of my job is hearing directly from you, and this past Friday in Nogales was a great reminder of that. Thanks to everyone who came out to my town hall. I'll keep showing up for Arizona.
We’re 6 months into a war that’s achieved nothing. 18 of our men and women in uniform have been killed, and the cost-of-living is crushing American families. It's time to end this stupid war and bring our service members home.
The most important part of my job is hearing directly from you. That's why I'll be in Nogales for a town hall this Friday to discuss immigration, delays in DACA renewals, trade-related challenges and inflation, and pathways to greater economic mobility in Santa Cruz County. I hope you'll join me.
This outcome speaks for itself. Big Tech companies like Meta are purposely harming our kids. That's why I introduced a bill requiring parental permission before kids under 16 join social media. Time to put an end to Big Tech making billions at the expense of our kids' well-being.
BREAKING: Meta settles for $17 billion with dozens of states in teen social media addiction case. The case, brought by a group of 29 states, was seeking up to $1.4 trillion in penalties. /1
110 years of the most beautiful landscapes in the world. Happy birthday National Park Service! (P.S. Thanks to my Veterans in Parks Act, veterans and Gold Star families can visit any national park for free, so get exploring!)
Trump just moved to gut Head Start, and Arizona families will feel it along with families across the country. For an administration that calls itself "pro-family," this is about as anti-family as it gets. We need to do everything in our power to fight back.
Latino men feel a deep responsibility to provide for and protect their families. We need to make sure they have the support to be good fathers, husbands, partners, business owners, and community leaders—while also valuing and empowering the Latinas in our lives.
As Trump moves to gut Head Start—a program thousands of Arizona's working families rely on—I met with parents and providers to hear what's happening on the ground. Head Start has given kids a fair shot since 1965. I’m fighting to make sure it’s still here for the next generation.
The biggest housing bill in over 30 years is now law. And it includes a key provision of mine that cuts red tape to build more housing, faster, and lower costs. Growing up, I didn’t always have a bed. But I always had a place to call home. I'm working to make sure every family can say the same.
NEW: I’m introducing a bill to ban cell phones in the classroom. Technology is an important part of our kids’ lives, and it’s not going away. But we can’t let it get in the way of their learning. Let's get it done.
Great to meet with students and faculty at Eastern Arizona College as they kick off the semester. We talked about public service, life in the Senate, and how to build opportunity right here in rural Arizona.
Stopped by the Safford Fire Department to thank some of our firefighters. As extreme heat and dry conditions increase the risk of wildfire, I’m working to ensure our firefighters have the resources they need to keep Arizonans safe.
Because of Trump's cuts to Medicaid, rural healthcare centers in places like Graham County are at risk of closing. Republicans are making people sicker and poorer to give tax cuts to the rich.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
899 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-41)
2025-06-09End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-06-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-41)
2025-06-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2025-06-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-43)
2025-06-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (57-38)
2025-06-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (48-46)
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-04End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (72-26)
2025-06-03End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (59-36)
2025-06-03End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (59-37)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-02End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (49-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-44)
2025-05-21H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NONOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NONOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55YESYESMotion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (45-52)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (45-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Failed (46-52)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-05-21S. 1582 (119th)Begin considerationYESNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31)
2025-05-19S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESNOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required)
2025-05-19Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-05-19End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-05-15S. Res. 195 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (45-50)
2025-05-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-05-14End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (54-40)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 13 / 18Next →