Ruben Gallego headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Arizona
Born
November 20, 1979
Age 46
Phone
(202) 224-4521
Office
302 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Arizona

Ruben Gallego

Rubén Marinelarena Gallego is an American politician and Marine Corps veteran serving since 2025 as the junior United States senator from Arizona. A member of the Democratic Party, he served from 2015 to 2025 as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Arizona and from 2011 to 2014 as a member of the Arizona House of Representatives.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 783
Yes33%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting13%
Party align91%
Cross-party9%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Ruben Gallego headshot
Ruben Gallego
U.S. SenatorDemocratArizona
SoupScore
Ruben's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 51 sponsored · 238 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

FACT: HHS is sitting on millions in vaccine funding. We need this $$$ to tackle the bird flu crisis. RFK will you use that money to help our farmers and food chain? No one should pay more for eggs because our government refuses to act on the avian flu outbreak.
The more we learn about the consequences of Trump’s Chaos Cuts the worse it gets. Cancer research, housing for homeless veterans, student loans, tribal broadband… this is not okay. We’re not letting up on this.
The Trump Chaos Cuts are threatening the safety and well being of Americans everywhere—from our children and elderly, to police and veterans. The administration needs to provide answers now.
Trump is risking funding that supports rent assistance, education, childcare, tribal communities, even suicide prevention for veterans. This administration's chaos and poor management is threatening millions of people. We're working with state and local officials to learn more.
I think anyone who tased a cop until they were unconscious should be in jail. Trump thinks they should be free to walk our streets.
It shouldn't be too much to ask for senators to oppose unconditional pardons for people found guilty of assaulting Capitol Police officers. I'm introducing a simple, one-line resolution condemning these pardons & will try to pass it on the Senate floor this week.
Between the rising price of groceries and the threat of avian flu, I am urging POTUS to tell the American people what steps he is taking to keep costs down for consumers and businesses.
Today on National Holocaust Remembrance Day we remember the atrocities of the Holocaust and honor the 6 million innocent lives lost.   We must combat antisemitism wherever it reveals itself and never become complacent in the face of hatred and discrimination.
On the campaign trail, I promised to fight for hardworking Arizonans—and I meant it.   That means stopping the administration’s plan to raise prescription drug costs just to hand billionaires another tax cut.
So Meta is "loosening restrictions on free speech" by silencing abortion pill providers? This isn’t free speech. It’s actually just stroking the ego of a new administration while risking the health and lives of women across the country. They need to answer for this.
My mom raised four kids by herself on a secretary’s salary. Looking for the cheapest eggs on the shelf is something I know well. But right now even the cheap brand is too expensive.    Trump said he could lower costs—it’s time for him to deliver.
Gov. Noem refused to answer questions I asked her. With the recent EOs that threaten the livelihood of Arizonans—especially the ending of birthright citizenship—I'm not confident she will carry out her duties in a way that respects the rule of law. That’s why I voted no.
I’m voting NO on Pete Hegseth. At a time when America faces evolving threats, from conflict in the Middle East, to an increasingly aggressive China, our service members deserve an experienced leader. Pete Hegseth is unqualified to lead the DOD.
Let’s talk about eggs: Prices have skyrocketed 38% in the past year. For many families in Arizona, this is an expense they can’t just shrug off. It’s time for Trump to take action to lower costs for families.
Far too many Arizonans are struggling under the weight of rising costs.   Serving on these subcommittees, my focus will be lowering housing costs, protecting everyday Arizonans from exploitative financial practices, and putting money back in the pockets of hardworking families.
Day 3 and the new administration has made their priorities clear: Raise the cost of prescriptions drugs to afford another tax cut for billionaires. That’s not what Arizona seniors voted for—and it’s not what they deserve.
← Newer postsPosts page 39
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
783 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (51-43)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (51-44)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Agreed to (81-15)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGYESBill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGNOAmendment Rejected (21-75)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGNOAmendment Rejected (15-81)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGNOAmendment Rejected (14-81)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Rejected (45-50)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Rejected (42-53)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAmendment Rejected (44-51)
2025-08-01Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114)NOT_VOTINGYESMotion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-08-01End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-41)
2025-07-31End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-44)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (53-44)
2025-07-31End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (59-39)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-41)
2025-07-30End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (59-38)
2025-07-30S.J. Res. 34 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34NOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (24-73)
2025-07-30S.J. Res. 41 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41NOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (27-70)
2025-07-30End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-07-30End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-49)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-44)
2025-07-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-28End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-07-28Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (50-39)
2025-07-28End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-07-24End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-48)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 7 / 16Next →