Jimmy Gomez headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 34
Born
November 25, 1974
Age 51
Phone
(202) 225-6235
Office
506 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 34

Jimmy Gomez

Jimmy Gomez is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for California's 34th congressional district since 2017. His district includes the Los Angeles neighborhoods of Eagle Rock, Boyle Heights, Downtown Los Angeles, Koreatown, and other communities. A member of the Democratic Party, Gomez served in the California State Assembly from 2012 to 2017.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 582
Yes38%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 34

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jimmy Gomez headshot
Jimmy Gomez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 34
SoupScore
Jimmy's ATmosphere Activity
19 recent posts · 15 sponsored · 84 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Elon Musk and DOGE are infiltrating our agencies, cutting essential jobs, then trashing the agencies to the public so they can soften the blow when they sell out Americans’ best interests to pay for billionaire tax breaks.
Today we honor the life of labor rights hero César Chávez. As a former labor organizer, I carry on his fight for better wages & benefits every day. With workers’ rights under attack by the Trump admin, defending the right to organize has never been more important. ¡Sí se puede!
The Trump admin. is laying off thousands of health experts — people who fight infectious diseases and help Americans access Medicare and Medicaid benefits. This decision is careless and irresponsible — and it’ll cost lives, especially as measles spreads.
The Trump admin isn’t fixing Social Security—it’s setting it up to fail. While Musk snatches private data to fight non-existent fraud, GOP-backed billionaires are circling, ready to cash in on your retirement. This isn’t reform, it’s a heist. 🚨💰
🚨Another win against Trump and DOGE! A court just blocked their attempt to seize Social Security info...for now. Trump keeps losing in court—even in front of judges appointed by Democrat and Republican presidents. The fight isn’t over, but we’re racking up victories.💪
CA thrives when everyone has a fair shot at success—regardless of gender identity. Had a great chat with my friend @labamby and the @translatinacoalition about their work defending LGBTQ+ rights. As an ally, I'm working to ensure equal opportunities for all in our community.
🗣️Hey Republicans — instead of being Elon Musk’s personal lapdog, how about doing your job?! I’m gonna keep demanding answers in the @WaysMeansCmte to hold Republicans accountable and protect Americans' personal taxpayer information from Musk and DOGE.
☎️ DOGE is making it harder for seniors to access their Social Security benefits. A leaked memo shows they’re slashing phone support, leading to longer waits & delays. Seniors paid into Social Security their whole lives—now DOGE is standing in their way of what they’ve earned.
Firefighters just fought to keep Angelenos safe from the devastating LA wildfires—risking toxic exposure that increases their cancer risk. We must have their backs. I’m cosponsoring the FIRE Cancer Act to ensure they get lifesaving screenings at no cost.
First, reckless layoffs—now, dangerous data leaks. Elon Musk and DOGE are mishandling your sensitive personal info. These people aren’t making government more efficient—they’re ransacking our government in broad daylight.
House Republicans are letting @ElonMusk & DOGE rummage through Americans’ Social Security, bank, and health info—without accountability. I, along @WaysMeansCmte Dems, will hold Musk accountable if they won’t. He needs to come before the committee to face the American public.
They’re finally saying the quiet part out loud—Project 2025 is Trump’s Agenda. And here’s the thing, it’s bad for our economy and country🚨 : 💰 Tax breaks for billionaires ❌ Gutting Medicaid ⚠️ Attacking workers’ & women’s rights We must fight back and stand up for working families.
While Trump attacks health care for seniors & people with disabilities, I’m fighting to expand it. I’m cosponsoring legislation with @RepLloydDoggett and @SenSanders to ensure Medicare covers dental, hearing & vision—because everyone should have access to the care they need.
🚨 The Republican budget proposal could strip California of tens of billions in federal funding for Medi-Cal (Medicaid) and CalFresh (SNAP). Cuts of this size would leave millions of families without access to affordable health care or food assistance. #MedicaidDayofAction
My honored guest for Trump’s address to Congress is Dr. Ilhan Shapiro—a community health pediatrician serving kids in #CA34. Dr. Shapiro knows the stakes of Trump and the GOP trying to gut Medicaid & slash critical medical research to fund tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy.
← Newer postsPosts page 43
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
582 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 539 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 747 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 4216 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 4275 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 3357 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 1917 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 3937 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3351 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3095 (119th)Fast-track passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderNONOPassed
2025-07-15H.R. 1717 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-14S. 1596 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1770 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1709 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-07-03H.R. 1 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 275 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 875 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 12Next →