Robert Garcia headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 42
Born
December 2, 1977
Age 48
Phone
(202) 225-7924
Office
109 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 42

Robert Garcia

Robert Julio Garcia is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for California's 42nd congressional district since 2023. A member of the Democratic Party, he served as the 28th mayor of Long Beach, California from 2014 to 2022. He was both the city's youngest and first elected openly LGBT mayor, as well as the first Latino to hold the office. He is the second person of color to be mayor of Long Beach, after Republican Eunice Sato, a Japanese American who served from 1980 to 1982. A former member of the Long Beach City Council, he was vice mayor from 2012 to 2014.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 498
Yes37%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting6%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 42

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Robert Garcia headshot
Robert Garcia
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 42
SoupScore
Robert's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 20 sponsored · 137 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

RFK Jr. is by far Trump’s most dangerous cabinet pick. We should be very concerned about the damage he could do to the health and security of our communities. The Senate must oppose him.
RFK Jr is a conspiracy theorist with no scientific or medical credentials. We cannot hand over the keys of public health to this dangerous and unqualified nominee. The Senate must reject him as Secretary of Health and Human Services.
Back in DC and getting ready for the week. Top of the agenda needs to opposing these horrific nominees. RFK and Tulsi Gabbard are on the hill meeting with Senators. We need to call out there lies and apply the same pressure we gave Gaetz. They are a danger to public health and our national security.
If I’m a resident who is seeing these drones regularly in my neighborhood and concerned and worried about what they are, then I would be demanding answers from the government. They deserve that.
This is insane and incredibly harmful to our leading paper in California. We want the news reported by journalists, not an AI bias meter, JFC.
LA Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong says his bias meter will use an A.I. patent called the “Reasoning Engine.” “The meter will be displayed atop a piece of writing to tell readers where it ranks on a scale that will range from ‘far left’ to ‘far right.’” www.latimes.com/california/s...
In Long Beach we passed laws to protect people, we converted our convention center to a migrant shelter, and we doubled down on our values. Cities across the country need to be ready and courageous. The fight will not only be in Washington DC, it will be here at home.
As someone who was mayor of Long Beach during the first Trump administration, I know that cities have an enourmous responsibility to protect vulnerable communities against Trump and his policies. Trying to use police departments as deportation officers is unconstitutional.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
498 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-11-20H.R. 5107 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5214 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H. Res. 888 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 80 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 130 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 888 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESFailed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-11-18H.R. 4405 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESFailed
2025-11-18H.R. 2659 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-17H.R. 1608 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-13H.R. 5371 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-11-12H. Res. 873 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-19H. Res. 719 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-18H.R. 1047 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3015 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3062 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 713 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5143 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5125 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 5140 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 4922 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 2721 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-15H.R. 3400 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-15H.J. Res. 117 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3486 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3944 (119th)Instruct negotiatorsYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 10Next →