PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Martin Heinrich headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Mexico
Born
October 17, 1971
Age 54
Phone
(202) 224-5521
Office
709 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico

Martin Heinrich

Martin Trevor Heinrich is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from New Mexico, a seat he has held since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, Heinrich served as the U.S. representative from New Mexico's 1st congressional district from 2009 to 2013. He and fellow senator Ben Ray Luján are the co-deans of New Mexico's congressional delegation.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 824
Yes34%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @MartinHeinrichFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Martin Heinrich headshot
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 251 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govMay 5(source)
It’s been a while since I was in 4-H as a kid, but it’s clear the next generation is ready to go. Last week @lujan.senate.gov and I met with New Mexico's FFA and 4-H leadership to talk about our collective future and the work we are doing to protect it.
Senator Martin Heinrich and Senator Ben Ray Luján stand and pose with New Mexico's FFA and 4H leadership teams.
Senator Martin Heinrich talks to a member of 4H's leadership team.
Leaders from New Mexico's FFA and 4H sit and speak at a table discussion with Senators Martin Heinrich and Ben Ray Luján.
Senator Martin Heinrich sits at the head of a table discussion with leadership teams from New Mexico's FFA and 4H.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govMay 1(source)
Chaos and uncertainty are not words you want to associate with wildfire preparedness. We have already seen how devastating these fires can be and so the decision to cut 10% of the workforce–and possibly more!–as we head into fire season is unconscionable and, yes, crazy.
Photo of U.S. Forest Service firefighters with the headline: 'Crazy' Forest Service cuts ignite fear, fury over wildfire risks
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 30(source)
Today I’ll vote to end Trump’s tariff tax that’s raising costs for New Mexico families on everything from coffee to electricity. This administration should be helping hardworking families get ahead — not punishing them with a tax of $4,000+ a year.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 30(source)
I’ve heard from hundreds of New Mexicans who have expressed concern about DOGE’s access to their sensitive information. Today, I asked the head of the Government Accountability Office how they’re auditing DOGE’s access to government IT systems and when we can expect answers.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 29(source)
In his first 100 days, Trump has: -Increased costs of health care, groceries, and utilities -Put a $4K tax on families -Attacked our kids’ education -Schemed to sell off your public lands -Fired wildland firefighters What he hasn’t done: -Anything to help working families
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 29(source)
This week I introduced my Housing for All Act to address the housing shortage and homelessness crisis in NM. We need to build and renovate more homes and provide community leaders with the support necessary to do so. I want more programs that help hardworking families get ahead.
Reposted bySenator Martin Heinrich
Senate Energy Dems@energydems.senate.govApr 25(source)
Yosemite was a national park before we had national parks. It was the first land we set aside for public use and preservation. As @padilla.senate.gov says, national parks are our greatest idea and we must continue to advocate for investment and protection of these precious lands.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 24(source)
Stripping Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks of its protections would be a reckless abuse of power and a slap in the face to countless New Mexicans. We have a moral responsibility to future generations that supersedes any ultra wealthy executive’s desire to line their pockets.
Trump officials consider shrinking 6 national monuments in the West
Interior Department officials are considering scaling back the boundaries of national monuments in the West to encourage energy development on public lands.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govApr 24(source)
“Simply put, our town cannot survive without gross receipts tax,” said Silver City Councilor Guadalupe Cano. “We don’t get gross receipts tax unless we get visitors here. Visitors come here for the Gila.” More in Albuquerque Journal ⬇️
New Mexico senator, congressman want more river protections
A new bill from Rep. Gabe Vasquez and Sen. Martin Heinrich would create more protection for the Gila River, the only free flowing river in New Mexico.
← Newer postsPosts page 29Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
824 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-20—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 276)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Wyden Amdt. No. 1156)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-20—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Agreed to (51-49)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-20—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-49)
2025-02-20—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-19—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-02-18S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-02-18—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-02-18—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45)
2025-02-13—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2025-02-13—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-02-13—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (72-28)
2025-02-13—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-12—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-12—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-10—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06—Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 17Next →