Yesterday morning, I joined a group of students in Albuquerque to discuss our work to reduce gun violence & save lives.
One day later and another community is reeling from the devastation of gun violence.
We need action. Now.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico
Martin Heinrich
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 776
Yes32%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align93%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 241 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
There is nothing more rewarding than serving others. AmeriCorps taught me that. AmeriCorps members and volunteers respond to natural disasters, protect our wildlife, and contribute to communities all across our country.
It’s a service we should be building on instead of cutting.
Medicaid covers more than 780,000 people in New Mexico.
If Republicans get their way and cut one third of Medicaid’s funding, that means:
• 83,000 rural residents lose health coverage
• 95,000 children lose health insurance
• More than 1 in 5 seniors lose nursing home care
What this administration is doing to public education is a disservice to our kids and our teachers. The White House wants us to give up, but I'll never do that.
Today I spoke with educators in Rio Rancho and I’ll continue to hear from and fight for people in the trenches.
My deepest condolences to the families and loved ones of the two service members killed in yesterday’s tragic accident. Keeping the service member still in critical condition in my thoughts and hoping for a quick recovery.
Thank you to New Mexicans to Prevent Gun Violence, @everytown.bsky.social, @momsdemand.bsky.social, and @studentsdemand.bsky.social for joining me today and talking about how GOSAFE can help us save real lives.
We can save lives while protecting responsible gun ownership. My GOSAFE bill is how.
Today, @fernandez.house.gov and I met with Pecos community leaders to discuss our Pecos Watershed Protection Act. Pecos deserves clean water free from harmful mining pollution and we’ll continue to push for permanent protections to protect the Pecos River.
The Buffalo Tract is the wrong place for a gravel mine. It would decrease home values, diminish quality of life, and disregard its cultural significance.
We need to make the protections that local communities fought for permanent by passing my Buffalo Tract Protection Act.
He’s right.
In 2021, the expanded Child Tax Credit cut childhood poverty almost in half.
But Republicans let it expire and in 2022, the childhood poverty rate doubled.
In the richest country in the world, no child should go hungry. Let's permanently expand the Child Tax Credit.
There it is. Trump will always take care of billionaires over working families.
Now the question is, did he use insider trading to take care of his billionaire donors?
Protecting our public lands also protects our wildlife.
This #WildlifeWeek and beyond, let’s be intentional about conserving our wildlife and the habitats they depend on for future generations.
As a sportsman and gun owner, I support responsible gun ownership. But we must do more to address gun violence in our communities.
I’m introducing legislation today to save lives while safeguarding Americans’ constitutional right to own a firearm.
In case you thought that Trump and Musk weren’t serious about gutting Social Security…
I'll always fight to deliver resources communities need to respond to wildfires and I’m pleased that my Aerial Firefighting Enhancement Act is a step closer to becoming law. It's urgently needed to expand operations essential to firefighters battling wildfires in New Mexico and the West.
Kristi Noem preparing to break down the door of your local pet shelter:
Another day of “winning.”
Zero attempt to discuss or listen to the communities impacted—that's what’s wrong with this administration. I’ll continue to push for permanent protection because while the Trump administration won’t stand with the people of New Mexico, I always will.
Gutting the Department of Education will be disastrous for New Mexico. President Trump doesn’t care, but I do. I will fight this unlawful order with every tool we have.
![Graphic with a quote from a letter from a constituent: "Eliminating the Department [of Education] could jeopardize essential programs that support low-income students, special education, and Americans with federal student loans, especially those with essential income driven repayment plans. I urge you to oppose any efforts to dismantle the Department of Education and to advocate for the continued federal support that ensures equal education opportunities for all students."](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did%3Aplc%3A67vugavgzxuc64jxpv4cqwbi/bafkreiff2ogbcay2c3jyfixzayhrcgt5irzn22h3ruhg3dwwolgvznlcb4@jpeg)
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History776 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
776 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (52-41) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (61-35) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (91-7, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-21 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-43) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-36) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-34) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-31) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-43) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (51-48) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (47-50) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Motion to Discharge H.R. 4 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Agreed to (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-07-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-47) |
| 2025-07-15 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-46) |
| 2025-07-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-07-15 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (69-30) |
| 2025-07-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-28) |
| 2025-07-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (46-42) |
| 2025-07-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-07-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-07-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-07-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-45) |
| 2025-07-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-07-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2025-07-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.