Martin Heinrich headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Mexico
Born
October 17, 1971
Age 54
Phone
(202) 224-5521
Office
709 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico

Martin Heinrich

Martin Trevor Heinrich is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from New Mexico, a seat he has held since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, Heinrich served as the U.S. representative from New Mexico's 1st congressional district from 2009 to 2013. He and fellow senator Ben Ray Luján are the co-deans of New Mexico's congressional delegation.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 776
Yes32%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align93%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Martin Heinrich headshot
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 241 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Dr. Jane Goodall has dedicated her life to conservation and has never lost hope that we can build a better world. I’m grateful for her partnership on the road ahead as we work to protect our public lands and wildlife.
Senator Martin Heinrich and Dr. Jane Goodall sit and speak in his office.
Dr. Jane Goodall speaks with Senator Martin Heinrich in his office.
Yesterday, I asked Directors Ratcliffe and Gabbard if their Signal chat included information on weapons packages, targets, or timing. Director Ratcliffe: "Not that I’m aware of." Director Gabbard: "Not to my knowledge." Interesting.
If Republicans had enough calcium for ONE collective spine, they would haul Secretary Hegseth to the Hill to understand how such an irresponsible, reckless, and likely illegal breach actually happened. “If” is a powerful qualifier.
Whether your kid needs extra help learning to read or an in-classroom aide, the Department of Education is how schools get resources they need. We can't let Trump and Musk take their chainsaw to our children's future just to give more tax handouts to their billionaire friends.
In 2018, it was my honor to finally present Navajo Code Talker Adolph Nagurski’s family with his Congressional Silver Medal. It's my job to make sure our veterans receive the recognition and care they’ve earned and I won't let Trump and Musk erase them from history.
These are just a few of the messages I’ve received from New Mexicans about what the Republican plan to cut Medicaid would mean for them and their families. As their Senator, I will fight any cuts to Medicaid, especially when it's to fund tax breaks for billionaires.
"It's very scary when [Medicaid] is keeping you alive."
"Just this week I had to apply for Medicaid for my 96-year-old Mother. This is something I never thought I would have to do, but all of her assets have now gone to the nursing home where she resides, so she has nothing left. Freezes or cuts to Medicaid, as well as Social Security, would be devastating for her at this time. She requires 24-hour care, but if she doesn't receive Medicaid the nursing home will not allow her to stay. 
It was my understanding that Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare programs were protected by law. However; it appears that, even though Trump/Musk may not be able to "eliminate" these programs, they are definitely a threat to major cuts. I don't "scare" easily, but admit that this administration is frightening."
"Yet again the Republicans are threatening my daughter's life by attacking Medicaid. Heather has to have infusions for her chronic anemia. Due to multiple health issues, she is unable to work and must rely on Medicaid for health care. There are so many Americans in the same situation. Republicans just don't give a damn about any of them. Protect Medicaid!"
"My granddaughter is currently living in assisted living due to mental/physical disabilities. I am deeply concerned for her welfare and future with cuts being talked about by the new administration.
Her mother died in 2000 and she is 27 years old, leaving myself, her only surviving relative, to make decisions and care for her. Without the assistance of various agencies this would have been impossible. Please let me know Christy can go on with her benefits unchallenged so she won't lose her quality of life."
The heroic work of Navajo Code Talkers saved countless lives and was instrumental in Allied victory in World War II. Trump and Musk’s efforts to erase them from our history is disgusting and a slap in the face to every American who’s risked their lives for our freedom.
Veterans make up 30 percent of our federal workforce. They deserve respect, not illegal terminations, demotions, and suspensions from a chainsaw-wielding, unelected billionaire. Proud to support the Putting Veterans First Act to show them the respect they are owed.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
776 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-10-20H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-43, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-16H.R. 4016 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-44, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-16End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-34)
2025-10-16H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-15H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-44, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-14H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (49-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (77-20, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (10-88, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (51-46, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (53-43, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2296 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (14-83, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-10-09H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 106NONOJoint Resolution Passed (50-46)
2025-10-09H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-10-09H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09S. 2882 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-08H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 105NONOJoint Resolution Passed (50-45)
2025-10-08S.J. Res. 83 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 83YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (48-51)
2025-10-08S.J. Res. 71 (119th)Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 71YESYESJoint Resolution Defeated (47-51)
2025-10-08H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-10-08End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-47)
2025-10-08H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-08S. 2882 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-08H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 104NONOJoint Resolution Passed (52-47)
2025-10-07H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-10-07S. Res. 412 (119th)Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-10-06S. Res. 412 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-10-06H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-42, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-06S. 2882 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-03H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-44, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-03S. 2882 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-03S. Res. 412 (119th)Resolution S.Res. 412NONOResolution Agreed to (51-46)
2025-10-01S. Res. 412 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-10-01Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-10-01End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-10-01H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (55-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-01S. 2882 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-30H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Defeated (55-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-30S. 2882 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Defeated (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-29S. 2806 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (37-61, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-09-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-09-19Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (47-43)
2025-09-19End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (47-45)
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Defeated (44-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-19S. 2882 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Defeated (47-45, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 16Next →