Martin Heinrich headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Mexico
Born
October 17, 1971
Age 54
Phone
(202) 224-5521
Office
709 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico

Martin Heinrich

Martin Trevor Heinrich is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from New Mexico, a seat he has held since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, Heinrich served as the U.S. representative from New Mexico's 1st congressional district from 2009 to 2013. He and fellow senator Ben Ray Luján are the co-deans of New Mexico's congressional delegation.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 783
Yes32%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align93%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Martin Heinrich headshot
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 247 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

New Mexico families deserve the best possible health care in their communities. I introduced legislation to help ensure pregnant mothers and infants have access to essential screening and treatment for congenital syphilis.
Despite Elon Musk and Donald Trump’s best efforts, Democrats came together to avert a disastrous government shutdown. And we secured $1.5 billion for New Mexicans recovering from the Hermit’s Peak/Calf Canyon Fire. We got this done for working families, but our work continues.
This is huge: We just voted to send the Social Security Fairness Act to President Joe Biden's desk. Over 2 million retired public servants - police officers, firefighters, bus drivers, teachers - will finally receive the benefits they've earned after a lifetime of hard work.
Billionaires won't feel the impact of Trump’s government shutdown, but working families will. Our troops & law enforcement working without a paycheck. Families going hungry, not able to afford their bills. This isn't a game. Or a reality TV show.
Fair pay. Safe working conditions. Good benefits. Right to organize. That's what all workers deserve. I stand with the Amazon Teamsters on strike. Amazon should recognize the union and negotiate a fair contract.
Remember the bipartisan border security bill that Republicans tanked because Trump said to? Republicans will do or say whatever Trump & his billionaire friends want them to. Even if it means your safety or your paycheck.
Today marks 10 years since we successfully transferred management of the Valles Caldera to the National Park Service, expanding public access of this breathtaking place for more New Mexicans to enjoy & investing in our outdoor recreation economy. Public lands belong in public hands.
Elon Musk & Donald Trump don’t have to worry about paying rent or buying groceries as a government shutdown looms. But millions of New Mexican families do — including federal workers & service members. They're using working families' livelihoods as a bargaining chip for their billionaire buddies.
Translation of what’s happening today in DC: The richest guy on the planet is shutting down the government and taking recovery funds away from fire victims so that he can tee up a tax cut for billionaires in 2025.
So we're clear: Elon Musk & Donald Trump want to raise the debt ceiling to afford their tax cut for billionaires. What they're saying is, if Republicans don't pave the way for their tax cut for the rich, then our troops don't get paid for Christmas. To them, working Americans are a bargaining chip.
NEWS: My legislation to reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Act is headed to the President's desk! This bill will improve access to clean drinking water, bolster our outdoor rec economy, & protect wildlife & their habitats for future generations.
Right now, President-elect Trump is urging members of Congress to vote against funding for those impacted by the Hermit’s Peak/Calf Canyon Fire and the entire end of year funding legislation.
I am honored to serve as Ranking Member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. My work will be grounded in my love of public lands, my understanding of energy technologies, and my unwavering commitment to deliver for the people & places in NM & across our country.
The Senate just voted to send this year's NDAA to the President's desk, including key wins I secured for New Mexico's national labs & military installations & a historic pay raise for junior enlisted service members.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
783 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-43)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-44)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (81-15)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (21-75)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (15-81)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (14-81)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (45-50)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (42-53)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (44-51)
2025-08-01Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114)YESYESMotion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-08-01End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-41)
2025-07-31End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-44)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-44)
2025-07-31End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-39)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-41)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (59-38)
2025-07-30S.J. Res. 34 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (24-73)
2025-07-30S.J. Res. 41 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (27-70)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-49)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-44)
2025-07-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-28End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-07-28Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-39)
2025-07-28End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-07-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-48)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 7 / 16Next →