It was great to have these friends and leaders from Belén and Isleta Pueblo join me in welcoming President Biden to town.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico
Martin Heinrich
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 837
Yes34%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 44 sponsored · 255 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
It is a huge win for Tribes’ longstanding effort to permanently protect the region and for the next many generations who will be able to experience these lands far into the future.
A big thank you to President Joe Biden for designating the Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni - Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon National Monument yesterday.
Senator Ben Ray Luján, Rep. Teresa Leger Fernández, and I are extremely disappointed by the decision of the Air Force’s leadership to relocate certain service members from Cannon to Davis-Monthan AFB, but we are equally committed to finding additional, forward-looking investments that enhance CAFB.
Yesterday I hand delivered a letter to President Joe Biden urging additional investments at Cannon AFB in Clovis. I’ve delivered over $660M in investments to Cannon during my tenure in Congress, and I am committed to continuing to deliver for Cannon, Clovis & the entire surrounding community.
Welcome back to New Mexico, President Biden!
We have local, trustworthy companies that provide great value. Solar is cheaper than ever, but be sure to get several quotes and include local firms with established reputations.
https://t.co/NODVDCAKh9
Efficiency standards are good for your wallet and our planet. According to U.S. Department of Energy, these new efficiency standards will put more than $1 billion back to American’s pockets.
https://t.co/B2vlXpQkMu
Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute is receiving $815K in federal funds for clinical research on neurological disorders to help fund essential services like patient safety monitoring and clinical trials.
In New Mexico, we’re leading the way. Last year, we passed our own Voting Rights Act – landmark legislation that:
On this day in 1965, the Voting Rights Act was signed into law. Today is reminder of the work ahead to continue protecting voting rights for all Americans.
New Mexico is at the cutting edge of the semiconductor industry. Our win last week in the Senate's annual defense authorization bill will help us continue to realize the full potential of this industry in New Mexico and across the nation.
https://t.co/1fnhfugKvh
There is more work to do to maximize the Great American Outdoors Act. And while I am making sure we make the most out of a fully-funded LWCF, I am immensely proud of the way the Great American Outdoors Act has delivered for our public lands.
https://youtu.be/tqrTpt3TwB8
The Great American Outdoors Act has also invested more than $15 million at Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge and $29 million at Bandelier National Monument.
LWCF is our most effective tool for opening up access to public lands, from Ute Mountain, the Salinas Pueblo Missions National Monument, Pecos National Historical Park, Sabinoso Wilderness, and Achenbach Canyon trailhead in Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks National Monument.
The Land and Water Conservation Fund has been instrumental in protecting and unlocking access to treasured public lands - from Valles Caldera National Preserve, to Valle de Oro National Wildlife Refuge, to Rio Grande del Norte National Monument.
Three years ago today, the Great American Outdoors Act became law. I was proud to lead this bipartisan effort to fix long-running maintenance challenges on our public lands and fully and permanently fund the Land and Water Conservation Fund.
Happy birthday, Representative Gabe Vasquez! Looking forward to continuing to deliver for New Mexicans with you.
There’s $271K headed to NMSU’s pharmacology, physiology, and biological chemistry research!
Thank you to those who have reached out. I’m grateful to report that my DC staff was safe and accounted for today.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History837 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
837 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17