Musk and his DOGE hackers are ransacking their way through the federal government one agency at a time – and NOAA is their next target.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 2
Jared Huffman
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 497
Yes38%
No59%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 2
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jared Huffman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 2
SoupScore
Jared's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 27 sponsored · 165 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
If Trump enacts a catastrophic freeze on federal funding, countless schools, nonprofits, & health care organizations throughout my district will suffer.
I convened a group of community members to hear directly from them on what’s at stake, and am doing everything I can to stop Trump’s illegal grab.
Trump opened the door for an unelected billionaire to dig through Americans’ Social Security and Medicare payment systems.
Elon Musk is scheming his way into every part of our federal government – and firing anyone who stands in his way. We cannot allow this.
USAID not only saves millions of lives every year, but it also protects global health and employs thousands of Americans.
Yet Elon Musk illegally shut it down – proving once again that Trump cares more about corrupt billionaires' interests than Americans' wellbeing.
Once again, Donald Trump is lying and appears to have no interest in telling the truth about CA water.
Some of these photos are from last spring when I toured a floating solar project funded through the Inflation Reduction Act. I confirmed with former Reclamation officials myself.
Trump's 25% tariff on Canadian goods is in effect, and folks will bear the brunt at the grocery store, gas pump, and beyond.
It's been 2 weeks, and Trump has already betrayed his promise to lower prices - instead he’s burning holes in hardworking Americans' pockets.
🚨💵Please fill out my form to report how Trump’s illegal move to withhold federal funding would affect you, your family, or your neighbors.
I am tracking every detail of Trump’s reckless avalanche of actions that have thrown the US into chaos, and I want to hear directly from you ⬇️
shorturl.at/QUqo8
This won’t be the last flagrant abuse of power to override the will of the American people. It’s part of Project 2025—and soon, the lead architect Russ Vought, will be calling the shots from the White House.
We won’t let them pull the wool over our eyes with constant misdirects & chaos by design.
Trump's reckless move to stop funding for critical programs left millions of people in panic and confusion.
The admin took a step back today to skirt laws and tamp down public outcry—but Trump’s executive orders to withhold funds are still alive and well.
Trump is throwing our country into utter chaos. Folks from every corner of my district are terrified of how this will impact life-saving programs they depend on.
He is setting the stage to operate as a king—and the American people are paying the price.
Trump is trying to be a dictator. He illegally ordered his cronies to strip away taxpayer dollars that folks rely on for health care, housing, cancer research, wildfire defense—you name it.
This takeover is an unprecedented attack on democracy and hardworking American families.
Reposted byRep. Jared Huffman
🚨🚨🚨 @rephuffman.bsky.social joins top House Democrats in rebuking Trump's unlawful midnight purge of inspectors general across the federal government.
No one is above the law. Trump must withdraw his action and uphold his obligation to the American people.
Wannabe dictator Trump’s Friday Night Massacre of over a dozen inspectors general is blatantly illegal and cannot stand.
Democrats will not stand idly by and watch democracy crumble.
We'll shine a light on Trump’s abuses of power and draw this corruption out of the shadows for everyone to see.
Reposted byRep. Jared Huffman
During a crisis, we should find ways to actually help the people we serve. Instead, the GOP jumped at the chance to gut our environmental protections—without helping our communities or giving firefighters a long-overdue pay raise.
We need real solutions to the wildfire crisis.
Saying we should get rid of FEMA and force people to fend for themselves is an appalling take from President Trump.
The federal government is here to help the people of America - not leave them in the lurch when disaster strikes.
Firefighters are battling apocalyptic blazes around the clock for pennies on the dollar of what they should be paid. They deserve more.
Shame on Republicans for voting against what has long been a bipartisan priority.
My bipartisan bill with Rep. Jay Obernolte builds on investments from the Biden-Harris admin so we can prepare our communities for worst-case scenarios and address the build-up of issues that make wildfires more destructive than ever.
The climate crisis is fueling catastrophic wildfires that are ripping through communities, decimating entire regions, and destroying lives.
The government should treat these natural disasters the same way as any other: by providing resources and empowering communities to build resiliency.
Instilling fear with fake emergencies to give yourself supreme power is right out of the Reichstag playbook.
Migrant crossings plummeted this past year, but Trump is declaring a crisis at the border to weaponize the military against legal immigrants and even US citizens.
We have record oil production, but Trump’s declaring an energy emergency to roll back clean energy investments and climate progress.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History497 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
497 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-10 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1228 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.