Margaret Wood Hassan headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Hampshire
Born
February 27, 1958
Age 68
Phone
(202) 224-3324
Office
324 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire

Margaret Wood Hassan

Voting Record — 885
Yes41%
No58%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align87%
Cross-party12%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Margaret Wood Hassan headshot
Margaret Wood Hassan
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Margaret Wood's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 53 sponsored · 233 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Families, businesses, and the economy all suffer when working parents can't afford child care for their kids. That's why I've introduced a bipartisan bill to create a Business Child Care Liaison at the IRS to educate business owners about available child care tax cuts for them and their employees.
Child care tax cuts often go unused by both families and businesses due to a lack of awareness. This report walks through sample scenarios that show how businesses and families can put the credits to work, reduce employee turnover, and save thousands on child care. www.cnbc.com/2026/06/22/c...
62 years ago, the Civil Rights Act affirmed a simple but powerful principle: every American deserves equal treatment under the law. As we reflect on that progress, we must remain committed to protecting the rights and freedoms that generations fought to secure.
Housing costs are hurting Granite Staters. Yesterday, @repchrispappas.bsky.social and I discussed how the bipartisan ROAD to Housing Act can help. President Trump is standing in the way of lower costs by refusing to sign this bill.
Granite Staters are beyond exhausted by the flood of scam calls, texts, and emails. Scams have a bigger impact on the global economy than the illicit drug trade — it’s essential to create a ReportScams.Gov portal to help victims report scams and get help.
People born in the U.S. are American citizens. President Trump's effort to undermine this principle was wrong and unconstitutional. I'm glad the court struck it down — and thank you to the Granite Staters who helped protect this foundational right.
At just 9 years old, Emelia Ajavon of Grantham founded Chess Club 4 Kids after noticing a lack of opportunities for students to learn chess in the Upper Valley. Her leadership and dedication to her community is why I am proud to name her June’s Granite Stater of the Month.
Four years ago today, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, stripping away a woman’s fundamental freedom to make her own health care decisions. This anniversary is a reminder of the ongoing fight for women to be treated as full and equal citizens in our country.
President Trump is suddenly refusing to sign the largest bipartisan housing affordability bill in decades just to strong-arm Congress into making it harder for Americans to vote. Yet another example of how he puts himself before the needs of hard-working families
President Trump's post announcing that he is canceling the signing of the ROAD to Housing Act
It was great to celebrate the opening of New Boston’s new fire station and recognize the fire fighters who risk their lives to keep the community safe. I was proud to work with the NH delegation to secure funding for this station, giving them a safe home for years to come.
Grateful to join the 38th Annual Northeast POW/MIA Network Vigil in Meredith. Our country will always fight to bring our missing service members home and never fail to honor the sacrifice of those who were captured or went missing while keeping America safe, secure, and free.
Senator Hassan meets with veterans at the POW/MIA vigil
Senator Hassan next to a service member at the POW/MIA vigil
This #Juneteenth I’m thinking of Ona Judge, who fled to New Hampshire 230 years ago after being enslaved at Mount Vernon. Her story embodies the Live Free or Die spirit and serves as a powerful reminder that the work of equality remains unfinished. www.wmur.com/article/mura...
The allegations against Corey Lewandowski point to an unacceptable pattern of corruption and self-dealing. American taxpayers deserve answers and accountability for his conduct at DHS. That’s why I am launching an investigation into his actions while working for DHS.
Our government needs a comprehensive effort to combat scams. Americans deserve one clear place to report scams and find help. Senator Rick Scott and I introduced legislation to create a ReportScams​.Gov portal to do just that. www.nbcnews.com/tech/securit...
It was great to join Granite Staters at last week's Experience New Hampshire event at the Capitol. New Hampshire’s businesses, communities, and people are what make our state so special – and worth fighting for every day.
A new Joint Economic Committee Minority report finds that under President Trump, inflation has already cost families an additional $3,100. Working families can’t afford to “love inflation” like Trump and his billionaire buddies -- they’re too busy paying for it.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
885 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-30H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Defeated (55-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-30S. 2882 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Defeated (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-29S. 2806 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (37-61, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-09-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-09-19Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (47-43)
2025-09-19End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (47-45)
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Defeated (44-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-19S. 2882 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Defeated (47-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-18Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-09-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-09-17Decision of the Chair PN12-19 and PN25-28 and PN12-45 and PN22-1 and PN22-2 and PN22-5 and PN22-27 and PN22-20 and PN22-21 and PN26-8 and PN26-34 and PN26-35 and PN55-41 and PN22-4 and PN22-8 and PN22-19 and PN26-1 and PN22-23 and PN25-40 and PN26-7 and PN26-19 and PN26-31 and PN60-3 and PN26-44 and PN25-2 and PN55-16 and PN60-9 and PN60-10 and PN129-8 and PN26-45 and PN141-37 and PN141-7 and PN141-28 and PN12-22 and PN25-21 and PN22-3 and PN26-22 and PN13-5 and PN22-24 and PN25-33 and PN141-18 and PN150-5 and PN345-16 and PN55-42 and PN54-6 and PN54-7 and PN55-45 and PN55-25YESYESDecision of Chair Not Sustained (47-52)
2025-09-17Motion to Reconsider PN55-25 and PN55-45 and PN54-7 and PN54-6 and PN55-42 and PN345-16 and PN150-5 and PN141-18 and PN25-33 and PN22-24 and PN13-5 and PN26-22 and PN22-3 and PN25-21 and PN12-22 and PN141-28 and PN141-7 and PN141-37 and PN26-45 and PN129-8 and PN60-10 and PN60-9 and PN55-16 and PN25-2 and PN26-44 and PN60-3 and PN26-31 and PN26-19 and PN26-7 and PN25-40 and PN22-23 and PN26-1 and PN22-19 and PN22-8 and PN22-4 and PN55-41 and PN26-35 and PN26-34 and PN26-8 and PN22-21 and PN22-20 and PN22-27 and PN22-5 and PN22-2 and PN22-1 and PN12-45 and PN12-19 and PN25-28NONOMotion to Reconsider Agreed to (51-47)
2025-09-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-16S. Con. Res. 22 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (36-62)
2025-09-16S.J. Res. 60 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-51)
2025-09-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (48-47)
2025-09-15End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2025-09-15S. Res. 377 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOResolution Agreed to (51-44)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)Decision of the Chair S.Res. 377NOT_VOTINGYESDecision of Chair Not Sustained (45-53)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)Motion to Reconsider S.Res. 377NOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Reconsider Agreed to (52-45)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-10S. 2296 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (51-49)
2025-09-09S. Res. 377 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-09-09S. Res. 377 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (53-46)
2025-09-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-09-09End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-09-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-46)
2025-09-09End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-09-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-09-08Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-43)
2025-09-04S. 2296 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (83-13)
2025-09-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-09-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-09-02S. 2296 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-14, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (71-23)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeYESNomination Confirmed (72-22)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (59-35)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-42)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (78-17)
2025-08-02End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (76-19)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-08-02End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-08-02End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-45)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-44)
2025-08-02End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-08-02Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (53-44)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 18Next →