It’s never too late to join the fight. We need you. We’re just glad you’re here now.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 776
Yes75%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 180 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
You may have voted for him. You may have supported what he said Operation Metro Surge was going to be.
But it’s okay to say you changed your mind. It’s okay to say he’s gone too far.
Reposted byTina Smith
ICE and DHS are out of control and making our communities less safe.
I will not support funding for DHS without clear accountability and stronger controls over the agency.
It is time for the Senate to do its job and rein in this lawlessness.
📍 Minneapolis
Reposted byTina Smith
ICE is out of control. Killing people, separating families, and terrorizing our communities.
I’m a NO on the DHS funding bill.
Reposted byTina Smith
A video of Alex Pretti reading out the final salute of an unnamed veteran he cared for until the end of his life in the ICU, posted to Facebook by his son.
Reposted byTina Smith
Kare 11 local news just read, in full, this statement from Michael and Susan Pretti, the parents of Alex Pretti.
"Please get the truth out about our son."
He wasn't a domestic terrorist. A domestic terrorist was the Oklahoma City bomber. This was a VA nurse looking out for his neighbors.
I certainly won't be.
For those asking where we go from here: Not voting to fund ICE is a great place for us to start.
Reposted byTina Smith
Minnesota’s Congressional Democrats are united. We’re speaking with one voice to condemn the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti and to demand that ICE, DHS, and CBP agents leave our state immediately.
Another catastrophic shooting in Minneapolis by federal agents.
We are gathering more information, but ICE must leave now so MPD can secure the scene and do their jobs.
Journalists and bystanders are capturing what JD Vance really doesn’t want us to see.
Is this the country we want to live in?
What made the child a threat JD? Was it the floppy ears or the Spider Man backpack?
What made the child a threat JD? Was it the floppy ears or the Spider Man backpack?
My power is my vote as a Senator, and I’m not voting to send an extra dollar in funding to ICE/DHS while they trample on Minnesotans like this.
Where is our humanity? Where have our shared values of gone? How can we justify using a little boy in a bunny hat and Spider Man backpack as bait?
You may have voted for the President under the guise that he was only going after thugs and criminals. He lied to you.
This family did every single thing they’ve been asked to in order to seek asylum here.
Yet in less than 24 hours, this kid and his Dad were nabbed off our streets and sent to Texas, using tactics that can only be described as pure evil.
Reposted byTina Smith
American citizens do not need to “prove” their identity to ICE agents to avoid arrest and detention.
Unconstitutional.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History776 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
776 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (14-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (42-53) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (44-51) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-41) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-41) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-38) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 34 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (24-73) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 41 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (27-70) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-44) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-39) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.