PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes74%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenHydeSmithFacebookInstagram
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 181 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMay 2(source)
We should all be paying attention to what this means. Getting rid of Roe wasn’t the end game and they will go further. Anti choice extremists in state legislatures are teaming up with allies on the federal bench to take your freedom to control the course of your life.
Court restricts abortion access across the US by blocking the mailing of mifepristone
A federal appeals court has restricted access to one of the most common means of abortion in the U.S. by blocking the mailing of mifepristone.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 20(source)
Minnesota and countless other states have proven how we can safely decriminalize and regulate the cannabis industry. Long overdue for the federal government to take a page out of that playbook.
Reposted byTina Smith
Save the Boundary Waters@savetheboundarywaters.orgApr 20(source)
Last week, the U.S. Senate passed a devastating bill that will undo protections for the Boundary Waters. Listen to this feature on NPR's All Things Considered featuring Explorers Amy and Dave Freemans and @smith.senate.gov discussing what this means for the wilderness. www.npr.org/2026/04/18/n...
Newly approved mining in Minnesota may threaten waterways of a beloved nature preserve
Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness in Minnesota is filled with more than a thousand lakes and rivers. But a recent vote in congress to allow mining nearby could threaten the preserve's waterways.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 17(source)
The fight for the Boundary Waters isn’t over, it just looks a little different now. We will not give up. That would play right into their hands.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 17(source)
Losing hope is exactly what they want us to do. While the vote against the Boundary Waters is fresh on our minds, the work continues.    Headed to Greater Minnesota now to keep up the fight. We have so much to do to tackle corporate greed in areas like housing and health care.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 16(source)
Since they’re abusing the Congressional Review Act to get around the filibuster, I am reserving some of my time so I can make closing remarks in the morning before the final vote. Maybe they’ll listen to reason after a night’s sleep. Stay tuned. Save the Boundary Waters.
Photo of my desk with a boundary waters canoe area forest service sign next to the Minnesota state flag and a framed photo of my parents.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 15(source)
70% of Minnesotans do NOT want copper nickel mining near the Boundary Waters. The Senate has a chance to do right by them by leaving the mining moratorium in place.
Reposted byTina Smith
Patagonia@patagonia.comApr 15(source)
As soon as today, the US Senate will vote on a House resolution that allows copper mining by a Chilean company near Minnesota’s Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. The Boundary Waters is the most-visited wilderness area in the country, and it cannot be replaced.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 13(source)
The Boundary Waters don’t just belong to Minnesotans. They’re the birthright of every single American. Why would we let a foreign mining company ruin them just so they can mine OUR resources, ship them off to China and enrich their shareholders?
Map showing the pollution a proposed copper-nickel mine would have on the Boundary Waters, Voyageurs National Park and Quetico Provincial Park.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govApr 13(source)
The threat to the Boundary Waters isn’t just about Minnesota — the legislative gymnastics being thrust upon us to allow copper-nickel mining in this watershed would mean no public lands are ever truly protected. We would be opening Pandora’s box… for what? The profits of a foreign mining company?
Photo of a canoe in the Boundary Waters. The waters are so still that the sky is reflected on the surface.
← Newer postsPosts page 2Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
783 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-04—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYES—Nomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03—Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGYES—Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21—Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21—Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Bill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16