Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Voting Record — 890
Yes73%
No25%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 205 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

We are going to see unheard of levels of spin after today’s inflation report – and they are going to do something unfathomably insane to try and wrestle media attention away from it.
Installing a crank economist to only publish favorable or distorted data on the economy (inflation, jobs numbers, etc.)   Textbook authoritarianism – mum from my GOP colleagues.
🚨 Trump's new BLS nominee E.J. Antoni suggests pausing the monthly jobs report: Until it is corrected, the BLS should suspend issuing the monthly job reports but keep publishing the more accurate, though less timely, quarterly data
Many VA employees are veterans themselves. Canceling their union contracts is not only insulting to their service, but it’s going to make the quality of care for our veterans worse. These men and women made incredible sacrifices for our country. This is not how we repay them.
The VA terminating the union contracts of their workers is an ambush on the people who care for our veterans. The Trump admin may think they can silence anyone who pushes back against their unlawful and anti-worker actions, but we aren’t going anywhere. aflcio.org/press/releas...
Reminder that insurrectionists attacked police officers on January 6th and Trump pardoned every one of them.   This one wanted to go after the officer he attacked.
A Jan. 6 defendant, convicted for the brutal beating of an MPD officer, lost his bid to FOIA records about the victim officer — in part because Trump's pardon made it moot Webster, a former NYPD officer, had been sentenced to 10 years before the pardon ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show...
Reposted byTina Smith
Under 5 U.S.C §2954, HSGAC has the unique authority to request information from any executive agency that falls within our Committee’s oversight jurisdiction. We are using that authority to request the Epstein files from AG Bondi. The American people deserve transparency.
I hear about this all the time from constituents. People are repulsed by the inhumanity of this and how innocent people are being targeted when they are just trying to figure out how to get just a little bit of food – literally starving to death. I stand firmly against that.
Civilians in Gaza have been turned into a weapon of war in a way that is despicable. The point of this letter and the point of what many of us have been doing for months is to put pressure on the Netanyahu government to change their policy.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
890 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 18 / 18