I’ve worked closely with these fine legislators for many years. Archie and I are grateful for the incredible response of law enforcement and hope that everyone will be safe today.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes73%
No25%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 205 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
This morning Minnesota woke up to news of a brutal act of violence targeting public servants. I am heartbroken to learn that our Speaker Melissa Hortman, Sen. John Hoffman and their spouses have been shot.
Reposted byTina Smith
If this is how this administration responds to a Senator with a question, you can only imagine what they're doing to farmworkers, to cooks, and to day laborers throughout California and across the country.
We will hold this administration accountable.
Reposted byTina Smith
If that’s what they do to a United States Senator with a question, imagine what they can do to any American that dares to speak up. We will hold this administration accountable.
It’s not illegal for a United States Senator to go to a public press conference and ask questions about your constituents safety.
It's our job.
Kristi Noem should resign in disgrace.
This is disgusting.
If this is how they treat Alex Padilla, a United States Senator, how do you think they’ll treat you?
Always interesting when nominees go above and beyond just to avoid answering a simple question…
Reposted byTina Smith
BESSENT: We are trying to bend the curve on medical cost. And I believe that the medical expenses are out of control.
TINA SMITH: But you're not controlling medical expenses by taking insurance away from people. You're just shifting the cost to hospitals and individuals and uncompensated care.
Reposted byTina Smith
Trump's "big, beautiful bill" would be the single largest transfer of wealth from the middle-class to the ultrawealthy in the history of our country.
A gift to billionaires and megacorporations outsourcing jobs paid for by betraying American families.
Using pseudoscience to justify bad actions is pretty par for the course for these guys.
Not this mine. Not this place. The Boundary Waters are too precious.
See you in court.
What “careful review”?
The one that showed this kind of mining nearly always pollutes?
Or the one that showed that mining in this place could irreversibly pollute the Boundary Waters?
If more Americans learn about your bill… and they really don’t like what they’re seeing… change course.
#KillTheBill
The GENIUS Act should not pass without a vote on this fix.
Republicans are jamming through the GENIUS Act which will turbocharge Donald Trump’s crypto corruption.
We need an amendment vote to stop the President, Vice President, and senior government officials from directly or indirectly profiting from a stablecoin venture.
This win shows that when we speak out and stand strong, together we have the power to stop this.
We need to pass my bill to permanently protect the Boundary Waters from sulfide mining.
Minnesotans who love the Boundary Waters and want it to be there for our children and grandchildren need to continue to organize and use their voices.
Republicans want to sell off our public lands to the highest bidder, and the Boundary Waters is no exception.
However, the fight is far from over.
Donald Trump and House Republicans are determined to revoke the protections I worked to put in place and that Minnesotans have made clear they support.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-01 | S. Res. 412 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-10-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-10-01 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-10-01 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (55-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-10-01 | S. 2882 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-09-30 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Defeated (55-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-09-30 | S. 2882 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Defeated (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-09-29 | S. 2806 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (37-61, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-09-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-09-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45) |
| 2025-09-19 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (47-43) |
| 2025-09-19 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-45) |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Defeated (44-48, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-09-19 | S. 2882 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Defeated (47-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-09-18 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-09-17 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-09-17 | — | Decision of the Chair PN12-19 and PN25-28 and PN12-45 and PN22-1 and PN22-2 and PN22-5 and PN22-27 and PN22-20 and PN22-21 and PN26-8 and PN26-34 and PN26-35 and PN55-41 and PN22-4 and PN22-8 and PN22-19 and PN26-1 and PN22-23 and PN25-40 and PN26-7 and PN26-19 and PN26-31 and PN60-3 and PN26-44 and PN25-2 and PN55-16 and PN60-9 and PN60-10 and PN129-8 and PN26-45 and PN141-37 and PN141-7 and PN141-28 and PN12-22 and PN25-21 and PN22-3 and PN26-22 and PN13-5 and PN22-24 and PN25-33 and PN141-18 and PN150-5 and PN345-16 and PN55-42 and PN54-6 and PN54-7 and PN55-45 and PN55-25 | NO | NO | ✓ | Decision of Chair Not Sustained (47-52) |
| 2025-09-17 | — | Motion to Reconsider PN55-25 and PN55-45 and PN54-7 and PN54-6 and PN55-42 and PN345-16 and PN150-5 and PN141-18 and PN25-33 and PN22-24 and PN13-5 and PN26-22 and PN22-3 and PN25-21 and PN12-22 and PN141-28 and PN141-7 and PN141-37 and PN26-45 and PN129-8 and PN60-10 and PN60-9 and PN55-16 and PN25-2 and PN26-44 and PN60-3 and PN26-31 and PN26-19 and PN26-7 and PN25-40 and PN22-23 and PN26-1 and PN22-19 and PN22-8 and PN22-4 and PN55-41 and PN26-35 and PN26-34 and PN26-8 and PN22-21 and PN22-20 and PN22-27 and PN22-5 and PN22-2 and PN22-1 and PN12-45 and PN12-19 and PN25-28 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Reconsider Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-09-17 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-09-16 | S. Con. Res. 22 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (36-62) |
| 2025-09-16 | S.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-09-15 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-47) |
| 2025-09-15 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2025-09-15 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2025-09-11 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-09-11 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Decision of the Chair S.Res. 377 | NO | NO | ✓ | Decision of Chair Not Sustained (45-53) |
| 2025-09-11 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider S.Res. 377 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Reconsider Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-09-11 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-09-10 | S. 2296 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-09-09 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-09-09 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-09-08 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-43) |
| 2025-09-04 | S. 2296 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-09-04 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-09-04 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-09-02 | S. 2296 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-14, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (71-23) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (72-22) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-35) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-42) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (78-17) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-19) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.