PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Val T. Hoyle headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Oregon District 4
Born
1964
Age 62
Phone
(202) 225-6416
Office
1620 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Oregon District 4

Val T. Hoyle

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 613
Yes43%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 4

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
BlueskyFacebookInstagram
Val T. Hoyle headshot
Val T. Hoyle
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOregon District 4
SoupScore
Val T.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 67 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byRepresentative Val Hoyle
AFL-CIO@aflcio.orgMar 31(source)
As @uaw.org President Shawn Fain said, President Trump is trying to gut unions and essential services to give him and his billionaire friends a tax cut. To every single person who cares about the fundamental freedom of all workers, now is the time to be even louder.
Reposted byRepresentative Val Hoyle
AFL-CIO@aflcio.orgMar 31(source)
Gutting the Department of Labor’s ILAB will harm America’s workers by encouraging outsourcing by greedy corporations looking for cheap labor. These cuts are a gift to billionaires and dictators who want to stamp out unions and roll back human rights.
Global Working Conditions Matter for American Workers
The Trump administration has cut programs that help prevent forced labor and child labor. This will suppress wages everywhere, including the U.S.
Representative Val Hoyle@repvalhoyle.bsky.socialMar 31(source)
On this Trans Day of Visibility, I stand with the trans community. Growing up in the labor movement, I learned at a young age that attack on one of us, is an attack on all of us.   All our rights are connected, and I am in this fight with you.
Rep Hoyle speaks at the Christopher Street Project’s Trans Day of Visibility rally.
Representative Val Hoyle@repvalhoyle.bsky.socialMar 30(source)
The President’s executive order taking collective bargaining rights away from federal workers is not about efficiency, it’s union busting. We’ve seen it before and we know that standing together is the only way to win. I am proud to stand with AFGE in this fight. #unionstrong
Representative Val Hoyle@repvalhoyle.bsky.socialMar 28(source)
President Trump’s Executive Order banning public sector unions is blatantly unconstitutional & is clearly union busting But when they come for one of us, they come for all of us. We will fight this fight for as long as it takes. I’m proud to stand with AFGE today and every day. #UnionProud
Reposted byRepresentative Val Hoyle
UAW@uaw.orgMar 28(source)
🧵 Statement from UAW President Shawn Fain on Attacks on Federal Workers: Yesterday, President Trump signed an order that tramples on the union rights of more than a million federal workers, stripping them of their ability to negotiate over their working conditions.
Reposted byRepresentative Val Hoyle
Chris Geidner@chrisgeidner.bsky.socialMar 28(source)
“AFGE is preparing immediate legal action and will fight relentlessly to protect our rights, our members, and all working Americans from these unprecedented attacks.”
AFGE Condemns Trump's Retaliatory Attempt to Outlaw Federal Unions
American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) National President Everett Kelley today issued the following statement in response to President Trump’s latest executive action attacking the collect...
Representative Val Hoyle@repvalhoyle.bsky.socialMar 27(source)
Rules for thee and not for me. If ANY career staffer had done this they’d have their clearances revoked immediately. But the “leaders” of those same staffers won’t take responsibility and instead choose to gaslight the American people. We need accountability. Hegseth and Waltz must resign.
A DHS staffer faces serious punishment for accidentally adding a reporter to a group email
The episode, which has not been previously reported, raises questions about unequal punishment for inadvertent leakers in the Trump administration.
Reposted byRepresentative Val Hoyle
MeidasTouch@meidastouch.comMar 26(source)
BREAKING: A high level information security source inside the Department of Defense says they were ordered by political appointees to ignore information security regulations and install Signal on government phones for senior leaders.
EXCLUSIVE: DOD has deployed Signal on government devices overriding their own policy
A high level source in DOD has confirmed that they were ordered to approve installation of Signal on government devices by Trump officials last month
Representative Val Hoyle@repvalhoyle.bsky.socialMar 26(source)
Turns out it wasn't DEI or trans servicemembers who put our security at risk, it was our unqualified Secretary of Defense. The biggest issue here is that this happened and our servicemembers could have died. The concerns we had about Sec. Hegseth's nomination were warranted. He should resign.
Representative Val Hoyle@repvalhoyle.bsky.socialMar 25(source)
Today, I called on my colleagues to listen to working people instead of talking at them.   Every Member of Congress should filter their work by asking, “Does this help working people?" Until then, we will keep losing support from working Americans & Republicans will get away with lip service.
Representative Val Hoyle@repvalhoyle.bsky.socialMar 25(source)
Washington IS slow and ineffective, but it's not because of dedicated civil servants, unions, DEI, or whatever else. It’s slow and ineffective because some of my colleagues think their constituents live in the White House, and not in their districts. (end)
Representative Val Hoyle@repvalhoyle.bsky.socialMar 25(source)
What’s worse is House Republicans could stop this. They control what bills we consider and debate. And yet, they’d rather use the precious time we have before hurricane and fire season to talk about bills like this.
Representative Val Hoyle@repvalhoyle.bsky.socialMar 25(source)
All the while, costs continue to rise. The Social Security system is breaking. Veterans are losing healthcare. We have a major national security breach, that needs to be addressed. This is what people are losing sleep over, and Congress is debating the name of the Gulf of Mexico???
← Newer postsPosts page 35Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
613 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-11H.R. 3944 (119th)Instruct negotiatorsYESYES✓Failed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Agreed to
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-09-08H.R. 3425 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-09-08H.R. 3424 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-09-03H. Res. 539 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Passed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-09-02H.R. 747 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-09-02H.R. 4216 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYES—Passed
2025-07-23H.R. 4275 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-23H.R. 3357 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-22H.R. 1917 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-22H.R. 3937 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-21H.R. 3351 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 13Next →