Ro Khanna headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 17
Born
September 13, 1976
Age 49
Phone
(202) 225-2631
Office
306 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 17

Ro Khanna

Voting Record — 612
Yes42%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 17

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Ro Khanna headshot
Ro Khanna
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 17
SoupScore
Ro's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 49 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

When a student is snatched from campus & denied due process, speak up. When a student protestor is harassed for their viewpoint, stand in their defense. When you’re told to keep silent about diversity by a potential employer, walk away. We must ask: What, in this hour, are we willing to risk?
In Vance’s America, the police can knock on any immigrant’s door, deport him to a dictatorship without due process, and then wash their hands of his fate, pretending that America is powerless to free someone outside our border.
In 2016, Bernie Sanders warned against the unholy alliance of wealth and power. Our party leaders shunned him. In 2020, he warned us again. Once more, the establishment rejected him. But this time Democrats and America are finally listening. There is hope, America. YOU are America’s hope
I was honored to be a co-chair of Bernie Sanders’ campaign. Because for me, his campaign has always been about a better way—America’s promise. And today, seeing the thousands gathered here—and the thousands more rising up across cities and towns— I’ve never been more hopeful.
Trump's blanket 145% tariffs against China are not targeted at strategic sectors & there is no plan for substitution or friend-shoring of the critical parts that our manufacturers need. All vital inputs we get today from China shoot up in price with no roadmap to build here.
Republicans in Congress stopped holding town halls. Democratic leadership failed us. So I went to three red districts and held town halls for the people. Here’s what happened:
Taxing the very rich & cutting defense contractors to pay for Medicare for All, universal education and $10 day childcare. And having the biggest high paying jobs development initiative this country has seen in decades. A pro growth, fiscally sound, progressive vision!
We need a transformative vision so that ordinary Americans have a shot at success in the modern economy. That is what my economic patriotism is about. It is about finally getting economic security and independence for the majority of Americans.
Why would we want to go back to that --where people in too many communities do not have high paying jobs, young folks cant afford a house, many struggling to pay medical debt or afford childcare.
We cant simply go back to an America where we neglect inequality, or watch jobs being shipped offshore passively, or are resigned to wealth piling up in NY and SV while most Americans have no economic security.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
612 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsYESYESFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 13 / 13