Ted Lieu headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 36
Born
March 29, 1969
Age 57
Phone
(202) 225-3976
Office
2454 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 36

Ted Lieu

Ted Win-Ping Lieu is an American lawyer and politician. He is a member of the Democratic Party and has represented California's 36th congressional district in the United States House of Representatives since 2023. He represented the 33rd congressional district from 2015 to 2023. The district includes South Bay and Westside regions of Los Angeles, as well as Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, the Palos Verdes Peninsula, and Beach Cities.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 566
Yes43%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 36

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Ted Lieu headshot
Ted Lieu
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 36
SoupScore
Ted's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 173 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byTed Lieu
As Members of Congress, we take an oath to defend the Constitution — the same oath that me, @reptedlieu.bsky.social, and every other service member has taken. We led 34+ House Democrats to demand accountability for the civilian detained by Marines in L.A. last week.
Trump’s disastrous policies have activated the American people. Trump cannot overcome the will of the people. Righteously: -exercise your right to freedom of assembly -exercise your freedom of speech This is how we save our country. And we’re going to flip the House.
Just talked to a trusted inside source—Trump’s inner circle is rattled by the No Kings protests nationwide. They didn’t mention Trump directly, but it’s clear they know just how toxic his brand has become. #NoKings
Reposted byTed Lieu
Absolutely horrified by the politically motivated attack on two Minnesota state lawmakers. Praying for the Hortman and Hoffman families. Political violence has no place in our society and those who commit it must be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
The world is on fire. We cannot have an unqualified person playing Secretary of Defense. Hegseth has repeatedly made grave errors. He must resign. Also, Hegseth’s taxpayer funded Pentagon makeup studio / glam countertop can only go so far in covering up his incompetence.
“Pete is playing secretary,” one source said. “He’s not being secretary.” Read Kerry Howley’s exclusive look at the most damaging scandal to emerge from Hegseth’s Department of Defense to date: not poor operational security, but a protracted public attempt to destroy his own top advisors.
Completely despicable actions by DHS, having Sen Alex Padilla being forcibly taken down. Why is @SecNoem afraid of answering questions? Even more Americans will now righteously exercise the right to protest. More will righteously monitor ICE. WE. WILL. NOT. BE. INTIMIDATED.
Padilla: “We will hold this administration accountable”
Reposted byTed Lieu
Peacefully protesting is a right. It’s completely un-American and needlessly provocative for Trump to deploy the National Guard and Marines against Americans. These are unlawful orders.
Reposted byTed Lieu
Hegseth deployed troops to Southern California without funding for food, water, fuel, or equipment. Marines are trained for military combat – not law enforcement. Trump must rescind his orders, Hegseth must resign, & law enforcement should be handled by state/local authorities.
I agree with Gov Gavin Newsom that Trump’s take over of the CA National Guard is purposefully inflammatory. I also note this federalization is being done under 10 U.S.C. § 12406, which means the Guard troops will still be subject to the prohibitions in the Posse Comitatus Act.
The federal government is moving to take over the California National Guard and deploy 2,000 soldiers. That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions.
WE WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED. I stand with SEIU California. I stand with President David Huerta. As Americans, we have the absolute First Amendment right to peacefully observe. As a result of extreme ICE actions, more Americans will righteously exercise our rights to monitor ICE.
Let’s be clear: ICE injured and detained the president of SEIU California for peacefully observing. ICE picked the wrong side. The wrong state. The wrong person. and the wrong union. David Huerta stood up. And now 750,000 SEIU workers are standing up behind him. seiuca.org/press-releas...
Reposted byTed Lieu
Maybe this is old fashion, but the goal of government is not to hasten the deaths of Americans. Republicans should reread the bible – Jesus did exactly the opposite of what they’re doing with their Big Ugly Bill.
Another day, another scandal under Hegseth. This is not silly stuff like Hegseth using taxpayer funds for a Pentagon makeup studio. The allegation here is an illegal wiretap. If they used an illegal wiretap on a senior official, you think they wouldn’t hesitate to use it on you?
White House stunned as Hegseth inquiry brings up illegal wiretap claims
Reposted byTed Lieu
Today, we honor those who sacrificed everything in service to America. We are forever indebted to our fallen heroes and their loves ones. Their courage and dedication must never be forgotten.
30-year mortgage rates jump to 7.5%, one of the highest levels in the last two decades. Trump and Republicans reckless economic policies—as exemplified in their big, ugly bill that explodes the deficit—caused yields and rates to increase.
JUST IN 🚨: 30-Year Mortgage Rate jumps to 7.5%, one of the highest levels this century 👀
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
566 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-22H.R. 1917 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 3937 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3351 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3095 (119th)Fast-track passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderNONOPassed
2025-07-15H.R. 1717 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-14S. 1596 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1770 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1709 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H.R. 1 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 275 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 875 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-06-25H. Res. 519 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as AmendedYESYESPassed
2025-06-24Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 537 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3422 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3394 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 1998 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-12Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 12Next →